@inproceedings{conf/vl/GoveDSKD11, author = {Gove, Robert and Dunne, Cody and Shneiderman, Ben and Klavans, Judith and Dorr, Bonnie J.}, title = {Evaluating visual and statistical exploration of scientific literature networks.}, editor = {Costagliola, Gennaro and Ko, Andrew Jensen and Cypher, Allen and Nichols, Jeffrey and Scaffidi, Christopher and Kelleher, Caitlin and Myers, Brad A.}, booktitle = {VL/HCC}, publisher = {IEEE}, year = {2011}, pages = {217-224}, url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/vl/vlhcc2011.html#GoveDSKD11}, isbn = {978-1-4577-1246-3}, keywords = {evaluating, exploration, scientific, sota, statistical, tools, vergleich} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Gove, Robert and Dunne, Cody and Shneiderman, Ben and Klavans, Judith and Dorr, Bonnie J. %B = VL/HCC %D = 2011 %I = IEEE %T = Evaluating visual and statistical exploration of scientific literature networks. %U = http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/vl/vlhcc2011.html#GoveDSKD11

While the use of MapReduce systems (such as Hadoop) for large scale data analysis has been widely recognized and studied, we have recently seen an explosion in the number of systems developed for cloud data serving. These newer systems address "cloud OLTP" applications, though they typically do not support ACID transactions. Examples of systems proposed for cloud serving use include BigTable, PNUTS, Cassandra, HBase, Azure, CouchDB, SimpleDB, Voldemort, and many others. Further, they are being applied to a diverse range of applications that differ considerably from traditional (e.g., TPC-C like) serving workloads. The number of emerging cloud serving systems and the wide range of proposed applications, coupled with a lack of apples-to-apples performance comparisons, makes it difficult to understand the tradeoffs between systems and the workloads for which they are suited. We present the "Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark" (YCSB) framework, with the goal of facilitating performance comparisons of the new generation of cloud data serving systems. We define a core set of benchmarks and report results for four widely used systems: Cassandra, HBase, Yahoo!'s PNUTS, and a simple sharded MySQL implementation. We also hope to foster the development of additional cloud benchmark suites that represent other classes of applications by making our benchmark tool available via open source. In this regard, a key feature of the YCSB framework/tool is that it is extensible-it supports easy definition of new workloads, in addition to making it easy to benchmark new systems.

@inproceedings{Cooper:2010:BCS:1807128.1807152, author = {Cooper, Brian F. and Silberstein, Adam and Tam, Erwin and Ramakrishnan, Raghu and Sears, Russell}, title = {Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 1st ACM symposium on Cloud computing}, series = {SoCC '10}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, year = {2010}, pages = {143--154}, url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1807128.1807152}, doi = {10.1145/1807128.1807152}, isbn = {978-1-4503-0036-0}, keywords = {comparison, database, hadoop, mysql, nosql, sql, toread, vergleich}, abstract = {While the use of MapReduce systems (such as Hadoop) for large scale data analysis has been widely recognized and studied, we have recently seen an explosion in the number of systems developed for cloud data serving. These newer systems address "cloud OLTP" applications, though they typically do not support ACID transactions. Examples of systems proposed for cloud serving use include BigTable, PNUTS, Cassandra, HBase, Azure, CouchDB, SimpleDB, Voldemort, and many others. Further, they are being applied to a diverse range of applications that differ considerably from traditional (e.g., TPC-C like) serving workloads. The number of emerging cloud serving systems and the wide range of proposed applications, coupled with a lack of apples-to-apples performance comparisons, makes it difficult to understand the tradeoffs between systems and the workloads for which they are suited. We present the "Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark" (YCSB) framework, with the goal of facilitating performance comparisons of the new generation of cloud data serving systems. We define a core set of benchmarks and report results for four widely used systems: Cassandra, HBase, Yahoo!'s PNUTS, and a simple sharded MySQL implementation. We also hope to foster the development of additional cloud benchmark suites that represent other classes of applications by making our benchmark tool available via open source. In this regard, a key feature of the YCSB framework/tool is that it is extensible--it supports easy definition of new workloads, in addition to making it easy to benchmark new systems.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Cooper, Brian F. and Silberstein, Adam and Tam, Erwin and Ramakrishnan, Raghu and Sears, Russell %B = Proceedings of the 1st ACM symposium on Cloud computing %C = New York, NY, USA %D = 2010 %I = ACM %T = Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB %U = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1807128.1807152

@incollection{rahel2008papst, author = {Oesterle, Jenny Rahel}, title = {Papst – Kalif – König. Vergleiche sakraler Herrschaftsformen im Spiegel islamischer und christlicher Quellen des Mittelalters und moderner Forschung}, editor = {Drews, Wolfram and Oesterle, Jenny Rahel}, booktitle = {Transkulturelle Komparatistik. Beiträge zu einer Globalgeschichte der Vormoderne}, address = {Leipzig}, year = {2008}, pages = {57-72}, keywords = {-, Forschung, Herrschaftsformen, Karten, König, Mittelalter, Moderne, Papst, Quellen, Reisen, Spiegel, Vergleich, christlich, islamisch, kalif, sakral} }

%0 = incollection %A = Oesterle, Jenny Rahel %B = Transkulturelle Komparatistik. Beiträge zu einer Globalgeschichte der Vormoderne %C = Leipzig %D = 2008 %T = Papst – Kalif – König. Vergleiche sakraler Herrschaftsformen im Spiegel islamischer und christlicher Quellen des Mittelalters und moderner Forschung

@book{Gotz.2000, author = {Götz, Tilman}, title = {Managementkontrolle durch institutionelle Investoren in Deutschland und in den USA}, series = {Reihe}, publisher = {Eul}, address = {Lohmar}, year = {2000}, volume = {176}, isbn = {3890127746}, keywords = {Anleger, Corporate, Governance, ITeG_233, Vergleich} }

%0 = book %A = Götz, Tilman %C = Lohmar %D = 2000 %I = Eul %T = Managementkontrolle durch institutionelle Investoren in Deutschland und in den USA

@book{Muffelmann.1998, author = {Müffelmann, Jens}, title = {Change Management im internationalen Vergleich: Komparative Intensitäts- und Erfolgsevaluierung der auf die Prozeßoptimierung ausgerichteten organisatorischen Transformationsprozesse in deutschen und US-amerikanischen Unternehmen}, series = {Reihe}, publisher = {Eul}, address = {Lohmar}, year = {1998}, volume = {59}, isbn = {3890126294}, keywords = {Ablauforganisation, Change, ITeG_233, Reorganisation, Vergleich} }

%0 = book %A = Müffelmann, Jens %C = Lohmar %D = 1998 %I = Eul %T = Change Management im internationalen Vergleich: Komparative Intensitäts- und Erfolgsevaluierung der auf die Prozeßoptimierung ausgerichteten organisatorischen Transformationsprozesse in deutschen und US-amerikanischen Unternehmen