Doerfel, S. & Jäschke, R.: An Analysis of Tag-Recommender Evaluation Procedures. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013RecSys '13 , S. 343-346
[Volltext]
Since the rise of collaborative tagging systems on the web, the tag recommendation task - suggesting suitable tags to users of such systems while they add resources to their collection - has been tackled. However, the (offline) evaluation of tag recommendation algorithms usually suffers from difficulties like the sparseness of the data or the cold start problem for new resources or users. Previous studies therefore often used so-called post-cores (specific subsets of the original datasets) for their experiments. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale experiment in which we analyze different tag recommendation algorithms on different cores of three real-world datasets. We show, that a recommender's performance depends on the particular core and explore correlations between performances on different cores.

Doerfel, S. & Jäschke, R.: An analysis of tag-recommender evaluation procedures. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013RecSys '13 , S. 343-346
[Volltext]
Since the rise of collaborative tagging systems on the web, the tag recommendation task - suggesting suitable tags to users of such systems while they add resources to their collection - has been tackled. However, the (offline) evaluation of tag recommendation algorithms usually suffers from difficulties like the sparseness of the data or the cold start problem for new resources or users. Previous studies therefore often used so-called post-cores (specific subsets of the original datasets) for their experiments. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale experiment in which we analyze different tag recommendation algorithms on different cores of three real-world datasets. We show, that a recommender's performance depends on the particular core and explore correlations between performances on different cores.

Krause, B.; Lerch, H.; Hotho, A.; Roßnagel, A. & Stumme, G.: Datenschutz im Web 2.0 am Beispiel des sozialen Tagging-Systems BibSonomy.. In: Informatik Spektrum 35 (2012), Nr. 1, S. 12-23
[Volltext]

Benz, D.; Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Krause, B.; Mitzlaff, F.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G.: The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy. In: The VLDB Journal 19 (2010), Nr. 6, S. 849-875
[Volltext]
Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.

Körner, C.; Benz, D.; Strohmaier, M.; Hotho, A. & Stumme, G.: Stop Thinking, start Tagging - Tag Semantics emerge from Collaborative Verbosity. Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2010). Raleigh, NC, USA: ACM, 2010
[Volltext]
Recent research provides evidence for the presence of emergent semantics in collaborative tagging systems. While several methods have been proposed, little is known about the factors that influence the evolution of semantic structures in these systems. A natural hypothesis is that the quality of the emergent semantics depends on the pragmatics of tagging: Users with certain usage patterns might contribute more to the resulting semantics than others. In this work, we propose several measures which enable a pragmatic differentiation of taggers by their degree of contribution to emerging semantic structures. We distinguish between categorizers, who typically use a small set of tags as a replacement for hierarchical classification schemes, and describers, who are annotating resources with a wealth of freely associated, descriptive keywords. To study our hypothesis, we apply semantic similarity measures to 64 different partitions of a real-world and large-scale folksonomy containing different ratios of categorizers and describers. Our results not only show that ‘verbose’ taggers are most useful for the emergence of tag semantics, but also that a subset containing only 40% of the most ‘verbose’ taggers can produce results that match and even outperform the semantic precision obtained from the whole dataset. Moreover, the results suggest that there exists a causal link between the pragmatics of tagging and resulting emergent semantics. This work is relevant for designers and analysts of tagging systems interested (i) in fostering the semantic development of their platforms, (ii) in identifying users introducing “semantic noise”, and (iii) in learning ontologies.