Social tagging systems have recently became very popular as a means to classify large sets of resources shared among on-line communities over the social Web. However, the folksonomies resulting from the use of these systems revealed limitations : tags are ambiguous and their spelling may vary, and folksonomies are difficult to exploit in order to retrieve or exchange information. This article compares the recent attempts to overcome these limitations and to support the use of folksonomies with formal languages and ontologies from the Semantic Web.

@article{4686305, author = {Limpens, Freddy and Gandon, Fabien and Buffa, Michel}, title = {Bridging ontologies and folksonomies to leverage knowledge sharing on the social Web: A brief survey}, journal = {Automated Software Engineering - Workshops, 2008. ASE Workshops 2008. 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on}, year = {2008}, pages = {13-18}, doi = {10.1109/ASEW.2008.4686305}, keywords = {folksonomy, ol, ontology, survey, toread, webzu}, abstract = {Social tagging systems have recently became very popular as a means to classify large sets of resources shared among on-line communities over the social Web. However, the folksonomies resulting from the use of these systems revealed limitations : tags are ambiguous and their spelling may vary, and folksonomies are difficult to exploit in order to retrieve or exchange information. This article compares the recent attempts to overcome these limitations and to support the use of folksonomies with formal languages and ontologies from the Semantic Web.} }

%0 = article %A = Limpens, Freddy and Gandon, Fabien and Buffa, Michel %D = 2008 %T = Bridging ontologies and folksonomies to leverage knowledge sharing on the social Web: A brief survey

Tagging, folksonomy, distributed classification, ethnoclassification—however it is labelled, the concept of users creating and aggregating their own metadata is gaining ground on the internet. This literature review briefly defines the topic at hand, looking at current implementations and summarizing key advantages and disadvantages of distributed classification systems with reference to prominent folksonomy commentators. After considering whether distributed classification can replace expert catalogers entirely, it concludes that distributed classification can make an important contribution to digital information organisation, but that it may need to be integrated with more traditional organisation tools to overcome its current weaknesses.

@misc{citeulike:1115448, author = {Speller, Edith}, title = {Library Student Journal: Collaborative tagging, folksonomies, distributed classification or ethnoclassification: a literature review.}, journal = {Library Student Journal}, year = {2007}, url = {http://informatics.buffalo.edu/org/lsj/articles/speller_2007_2_collaborative.php}, keywords = {folksonomy, survey, tagging, taggingsurvey}, abstract = {Tagging, folksonomy, distributed classification, ethnoclassification—however it is labelled, the concept of users creating and aggregating their own metadata is gaining ground on the internet. This literature review briefly defines the topic at hand, looking at current implementations and summarizing key advantages and disadvantages of distributed classification systems with reference to prominent folksonomy commentators. After considering whether distributed classification can replace expert catalogers entirely, it concludes that distributed classification can make an important contribution to digital information organisation, but that it may need to be integrated with more traditional organisation tools to overcome its current weaknesses.} }

%0 = misc %A = Speller, Edith %B = } %C = %D = 2007 %I = %T = Library Student Journal: Collaborative tagging, folksonomies, distributed classification or ethnoclassification: a literature review.} %U = http://informatics.buffalo.edu/org/lsj/articles/speller_2007_2_collaborative.php

This paper gives an overview of current trends in manual indexing on the Web. Along with a general rise of user generated content there are more and more tagging systems that allow users to annotate digital resources with tags (keywords) and share their annotations with other users. Tagging is frequently seen in contrast to traditional knowledge organization systems or as something completely new. This paper shows that tagging should better be seen as a popular form of manual indexing on the Web. Difference between controlled and free indexing blurs with sufficient feedback mechanisms. A revised typology of tagging systems is presented that includes different user roles and knowledge organization systems with hierarchical relationships and vocabulary control. A detailed bibliography of current research in collaborative tagging is included.

@misc{voss-2007, author = {Voss, Jakob}, title = {Tagging, Folksonomy & Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing?}, year = {2007}, url = {http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:cs/0701072}, keywords = {****, bibsonomy, folksonomy, indexing, km, knowledge, organisation, semantic, survey, tagging, taggingsurvey, toread}, abstract = {This paper gives an overview of current trends in manual indexing on the Web. Along with a general rise of user generated content there are more and more tagging systems that allow users to annotate digital resources with tags (keywords) and share their annotations with other users. Tagging is frequently seen in contrast to traditional knowledge organization systems or as something completely new. This paper shows that tagging should better be seen as a popular form of manual indexing on the Web. Difference between controlled and free indexing blurs with sufficient feedback mechanisms. A revised typology of tagging systems is presented that includes different user roles and knowledge organization systems with hierarchical relationships and vocabulary control. A detailed bibliography of current research in collaborative tagging is included.} }

%0 = misc %A = Voss, Jakob %B = } %C = %D = 2007 %I = %T = Tagging, Folksonomy & Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing?} %U = http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:cs/0701072