Why linked data is not enough for scientists
S. Bechhofer, I. Buchan, D. De Roure, P. Missier, J. Ainsworth, J. Bhagat, P. Couch, D. Cruickshank, M. Delderfield, I. Dunlop, M. Gamble, D. Michaelides, S. Owen, D. Newman, S. Sufi, and C. Goble.
Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (2): 599--611 (2013)

Scientific data represents a significant portion of the linked open data cloud and scientists stand to benefit from the data fusion capability this will afford. Publishing linked data into the cloud, however, does not ensure the required reusability. Publishing has requirements of provenance, quality, credit, attribution and methods to provide the reproducibility that enables validation of results. In this paper we make the case for a scientific data publication model on top of linked data and introduce the notion of Research Objects as first class citizens for sharing and publishing.

URL

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X11001439

search on

This publication has not been reviewed yet.

rating distribution

average user rating0.0 out of 5.0 based on 0 reviews

Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).

@article{bechhofer2013linked,
  abstract = {Scientific data represents a significant portion of the linked open data cloud and scientists stand to benefit from the data fusion capability this will afford. Publishing linked data into the cloud, however, does not ensure the required reusability. Publishing has requirements of provenance, quality, credit, attribution and methods to provide the reproducibility that enables validation of results. In this paper we make the case for a scientific data publication model on top of linked data and introduce the notion of Research Objects as first class citizens for sharing and publishing.},
  added-at = {2013-03-04T08:56:17.000+0100},
  author = {Bechhofer, Sean and Buchan, Iain and De Roure, David and Missier, Paolo and Ainsworth, John and Bhagat, Jiten and Couch, Philip and Cruickshank, Don and Delderfield, Mark and Dunlop, Ian and Gamble, Matthew and Michaelides, Danius and Owen, Stuart and Newman, David and Sufi, Shoaib and Goble, Carole},
  biburl = {https://puma.uni-kassel.de/bibtex/2f500b67a045765125183e23c827991d2/jaeschke},
  doi = {10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004},
  interhash = {8df8b7069a622aa2eae6d74e5fdc0a6b},
  intrahash = {f500b67a045765125183e23c827991d2},
  issn = {0167-739X},
  journal = {Future Generation Computer Systems},
  keywords = {data linked lod open reproducibility science},
  number = 2,
  pages = {599--611},
  timestamp = {2013-03-04T08:56:17.000+0100},
  title = {Why linked data is not enough for scientists},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X11001439},
  volume = 29,
  year = 2013
}

%0 Journal Article
%1 bechhofer2013linked
%A Bechhofer, Sean
%A Buchan, Iain
%A De Roure, David
%A Missier, Paolo
%A Ainsworth, John
%A Bhagat, Jiten
%A Couch, Philip
%A Cruickshank, Don
%A Delderfield, Mark
%A Dunlop, Ian
%A Gamble, Matthew
%A Michaelides, Danius
%A Owen, Stuart
%A Newman, David
%A Sufi, Shoaib
%A Goble, Carole
%D 2013
%J Future Generation Computer Systems
%K data linked lod open reproducibility science
%N 2
%P 599--611
%R 10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
%T Why linked data is not enough for scientists
%U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X11001439
%V 29
%X Scientific data represents a significant portion of the linked open data cloud and scientists stand to benefit from the data fusion capability this will afford. Publishing linked data into the cloud, however, does not ensure the required reusability. Publishing has requirements of provenance, quality, credit, attribution and methods to provide the reproducibility that enables validation of results. In this paper we make the case for a scientific data publication model on top of linked data and introduce the notion of Research Objects as first class citizens for sharing and publishing.

PUMA

Tags

Users

Comments and Reviews

Cite this publication