@article{haustein2011applying,
  abstract = {Web 2.0 technologies are finding their way into academics: specialized social bookmarking services allow researchers to store and share scientific literature online. By bookmarking and tagging articles, academic prosumers generate new information about resources, i.e. usage statistics and content description of scientific journals. Given the lack of global download statistics, the authors propose the application of social bookmarking data to journal evaluation. For a set of 45 physics journals all 13,608 bookmarks from CiteULike, Connotea and BibSonomy to documents published between 2004 and 2008 were analyzed. This article explores bookmarking data in \{STM\} and examines in how far it can be used to describe the perception of periodicals by the readership. Four basic indicators are defined, which analyze different aspects of usage: Usage Ratio, Usage Diffusion, Article Usage Intensity and Journal Usage Intensity. Tags are analyzed to describe a reader-specific view on journal content. },
  author = {Haustein, Stefanie and Siebenlist, Tobias},
  doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.002},
  interhash = {13fe59aae3d6ef95b529ffe00ede4126},
  intrahash = {c3e49ee7b0ed81ecd126d3ef76d5f407},
  issn = {1751-1577},
  journal = {Journal of Informetrics },
  number = 3,
  pages = {446 - 457},
  title = {Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage },
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157711000393},
  volume = 5,
  year = 2011
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2014evaluating,
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus},
  bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, http://dblp.org},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 16th {LWA} Workshops: KDML, {IR} and FGWM, Aachen,               Germany, September 8-10, 2014.},
  editor = {Seidl, Thomas and Hassani, Marwan and Beecks, Christian},
  interhash = {955cd7c6f7652b7c531b699464925b1f},
  intrahash = {4b2e73c82b5a84e1959ad66aaad4a235},
  pages = {18--19},
  publisher = {CEUR-WS.org},
  title = {Evaluating Assumptions about Social Tagging - {A} Study of User Behavior
               in BibSonomy},
  url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1226/paper06.pdf},
  year = 2014
}

@article{noy2008challenge,
  abstract = {The great success of Web 2.0 is mainly fuelled by an infrastructure that allows web users to create, share, tag, and connect content and knowledge easily. The tools for developing structured knowledge in this manner have started to appear as well. However, there are few, if any, user studies that are aimed at understanding what users expect from such tools, what works and what doesn't. We organized the Collaborative Knowledge Construction (CKC) Challenge to assess the state of the art for the tools that support collaborative processes for creation of various forms of structured knowledge. The goal of the Challenge was to get users to try out different tools and to learn what users expect from such tools-features that users need, features that they like or dislike. The Challenge task was to construct structured knowledge for a portal that would provide information about research. The Challenge design contained several incentives for users to participate. Forty-nine users registered for the Challenge; thirty-three of them participated actively by using the tools. We collected extensive feedback from the users where they discussed their thoughts on all the tools that they tried. In this paper, we present the results of the Challenge, discuss the features that users expect from tools for collaborative knowledge constructions, the features on which Challenge participants disagreed, and the lessons that we learned.},
  author = {Noy, N F and Chugh, A and Alani, H},
  doi = {10.1109/MIS.2008.14},
  interhash = {df2e2abfd18d3b415d4b6a7cac970286},
  intrahash = {98dcb79390913054e6255e605223f4b2},
  journal = {IEEE Intell Syst},
  month = {1},
  number = 1,
  pages = {64-68},
  pmid = {24683367},
  title = {The CKC Challenge: Exploring Tools for Collaborative Knowledge Construction},
  url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966208/},
  volume = 23,
  year = 2008
}

@inproceedings{heckner2009personal,
  address = {San Jose, CA, USA},
  author = {Heckner, Markus and Heilemann, Michael and Wolff, Christian},
  booktitle = {Int'l AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM)},
  interhash = {f954e699dc6ca2d0abbe5f6ebe166dc7},
  intrahash = {d1074484ea350ad88400fe4fc6984874},
  month = may,
  title = {Personal Information Management vs. Resource Sharing: Towards a Model of Information Behaviour in Social Tagging Systems},
  year = 2009
}

@techreport{doerfel2014course,
  abstract = {Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in
today's web and have attracted the interest from our research community in a
variety of investigations. The overall vision of our community is that simply
through interactions with the system, i.e., through tagging and sharing of
resources, users would contribute to building useful semantic structures as
well as resource indexes using uncontrolled vocabulary not only due to the
easy-to-use mechanics. Henceforth, a variety of assumptions about social
tagging systems have emerged, yet testing them has been difficult due to the
absence of suitable data. In this work we thoroughly investigate three
available assumptions - e.g., is a tagging system really social? - by examining
live log data gathered from the real-world public social tagging system
BibSonomy. Our empirical results indicate that while some of these assumptions
hold to a certain extent, other assumptions need to be reflected and viewed in
a very critical light. Our observations have implications for the design of
future search and other algorithms to better reflect the actual user behavior.},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus},
  interhash = {65f287480af20fc407f7d26677f17b72},
  intrahash = {e360f0bd207806e72305efe16491ebe3},
  note = {cite arxiv:1401.0629},
  title = {Of course we share! Testing Assumptions about Social Tagging Systems},
  url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.0629},
  year = 2014
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2013analysis,
  abstract = {Since the rise of collaborative tagging systems on the web, the tag recommendation task -- suggesting suitable tags to users of such systems while they add resources to their collection -- has been tackled. However, the (offline) evaluation of tag recommendation algorithms usually suffers from difficulties like the sparseness of the data or the cold start problem for new resources or users. Previous studies therefore often used so-called post-cores (specific subsets of the original datasets) for their experiments. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale experiment in which we analyze different tag recommendation algorithms on different cores of three real-world datasets. We show, that a recommender's performance depends on the particular core and explore correlations between performances on different cores.},
  acmid = {2507222},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems},
  doi = {10.1145/2507157.2507222},
  interhash = {3eaf2beb1cdad39b7c5735a82c3338dd},
  intrahash = {aa4b3d79a362d7415aaa77625b590dfa},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-2409-0},
  location = {Hong Kong, China},
  numpages = {4},
  pages = {343--346},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {RecSys '13},
  title = {An analysis of tag-recommender evaluation procedures},
  url = {https://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/doerfel2013analysis.pdf},
  year = 2013
}

@article{journals/insk/KrauseLHRS12,
  author = {Krause, Beate and Lerch, Hana and Hotho, Andreas and Roßnagel, Alexander and Stumme, Gerd},
  ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00287-010-0485-8},
  interhash = {3fca17b13ee1c002f41d3a2a4594b3e2},
  intrahash = {df97de393d3421ef2e20384ddde16ab1},
  journal = {Informatik Spektrum},
  number = 1,
  pages = {12-23},
  title = {Datenschutz im Web 2.0 am Beispiel des sozialen Tagging-Systems BibSonomy.},
  url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/insk/insk35.html#KrauseLHRS12},
  volume = 35,
  year = 2012
}

@article{journals/insk/KrauseLHRS12,
  author = {Krause, Beate and Lerch, Hana and Hotho, Andreas and Roßnagel, Alexander and Stumme, Gerd},
  ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00287-010-0485-8},
  interhash = {3fca17b13ee1c002f41d3a2a4594b3e2},
  intrahash = {df97de393d3421ef2e20384ddde16ab1},
  journal = {Informatik Spektrum},
  number = 1,
  pages = {12-23},
  title = {Datenschutz im Web 2.0 am Beispiel des sozialen Tagging-Systems BibSonomy.},
  url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/insk/insk35.html#KrauseLHRS12},
  volume = 35,
  year = 2012
}

@inproceedings{Ames:2007:WWT:1240624.1240772,
  abstract = {Why do people tag? Users have mostly avoided annotating media such as photos -- both in desktop and mobile environments -- despite the many potential uses for annotations, including recall and retrieval. We investigate the incentives for annotation in Flickr, a popular web-based photo-sharing system, and ZoneTag, a cameraphone photo capture and annotation tool that uploads images to Flickr. In Flickr, annotation (as textual tags) serves both personal and social purposes, increasing incentives for tagging and resulting in a relatively high number of annotations. ZoneTag, in turn, makes it easier to tag cameraphone photos that are uploaded to Flickr by allowing annotation and suggesting relevant tags immediately after capture.</p> <p>A qualitative study of ZoneTag/Flickr users exposed various tagging patterns and emerging motivations for photo annotation. We offer a taxonomy of motivations for annotation in this system along two dimensions (sociality and function), and explore the various factors that people consider when tagging their photos. Our findings suggest implications for the design of digital photo organization and sharing applications, as well as other applications that incorporate user-based annotation.},
  acmid = {1240772},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Ames, Morgan and Naaman, Mor},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems},
  doi = {10.1145/1240624.1240772},
  interhash = {bd24c17d66d2b904b3fc9444c2b64b44},
  intrahash = {bc08f76536610f3f376bece5f0b46ad5},
  isbn = {978-1-59593-593-9},
  location = {San Jose, California, USA},
  numpages = {10},
  pages = {971--980},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {CHI '07},
  title = {Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240772},
  year = 2007
}

@inproceedings{jaeschke2006wege,
  abstract = {Ein wichtiger Baustein des neu entdeckten World Wide Web -- des "`Web 2.0"'  -- stellen
Folksonomies dar. In diesen Systemen können Benutzer gemeinsam Ressourcen verwalten und
mit Schlagwörtern versehen. Die dadurch entstehenden begrifflichen Strukturen stellen
ein interessantes Forschungsfeld dar. Dieser Artikel untersucht Ansätze und Wege zur 
Entdeckung und Strukturierung von Nutzergruppen ("Communities") in Folksonomies.},
  address = {Halle-Wittenberg},
  author = {Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Proc. 18. Workshop Grundlagen von Datenbanken},
  editor = {Braß, Stefan and Hinneburg, Alexander},
  interhash = {59224b5889a24108434a9b5ecc6b0887},
  intrahash = {2b6be3bd5daee7119973fcf69909956f},
  month = {June},
  pages = {80-84},
  publisher = {Martin-Luther-Universität },
  title = {Wege zur Entdeckung von Communities in Folksonomies},
  url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2006/jaeschke2006wege.pdf},
  year = 2006
}

@phdthesis{jschke2011formal,
  address = {[Amsterdam]},
  author = {Jäschke, Robert},
  interhash = {dcb2cd1cd72ae45d77c4d8755d199405},
  intrahash = {1ac91a922a872523de0ce8d4984e53a3},
  isbn = {9781607507079 1607507072 9783898383325 3898383326},
  pages = {--},
  publisher = {IOS Press},
  refid = {707172013},
  title = {Formal concept analysis and tag recommendations in collaborative tagging systems},
  url = {http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org_all&q=9783898383325},
  year = 2011
}

@inproceedings{hotho2006das,
  abstract = {Immer mehr Soziale-Lesezeichen-Systeme entstehen im heutigen Web. In solchen Systemen erstellen die Nutzer leichtgewichtige begriffliche Strukturen, so genannte Folksonomies. Ihren Erfolg verdanken sie der Tatsache, dass man keine speziellen Fähigkeiten benötigt, um an der Gestaltung mitzuwirken. In diesem Artikel beschreiben wir unser System BibSonomy. Es erlaubt das Speichern, Verwalten und Austauschen sowohl von Lesezeichen (Bookmarks) als auch von Literaturreferenzen in Form von BibTeX-Einträgen. Die Entwicklung des verwendeten Vokabulars und der damit einhergehenden Entstehung einer gemeinsamen Semantik wird detailliert diskutiert.},
  address = {Baden-Baden},
  author = {Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Social Software in der Wertschöpfung},
  file = {hotho2006das.pdf:hotho2006das.pdf:PDF},
  groups = {public},
  interhash = {1b39e4a77cac919f9030601711aad543},
  intrahash = {a333df6fdc7ff9322e3ce03988a7965e},
  pdf = {E:\home\help_of_all_helps.pdf},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  timestamp = {2009-09-29 12:35:44},
  title = {Das Entstehen von Semantik in BibSonomy},
  url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2006/hotho2006entstehen.pdf},
  username = {dbenz},
  year = 2006
}

@article{benz2010social,
  abstract = {Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.},
  address = {Berlin / Heidelberg},
  author = {Benz, Dominik and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Krause, Beate and Mitzlaff, Folke and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd},
  doi = {10.1007/s00778-010-0208-4},
  interhash = {57fe43734b18909a24bf5bf6608d2a09},
  intrahash = {c9437d5ec56ba949f533aeec00f571e3},
  issn = {1066-8888},
  journal = {The VLDB Journal},
  month = dec,
  number = 6,
  pages = {849--875},
  publisher = {Springer},
  title = {The Social Bookmark and Publication Management System BibSonomy},
  url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/benz2010social.pdf},
  volume = 19,
  year = 2010
}

@article{benz2010social,
  abstract = {Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.},
  address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
  author = {Benz, Dominik and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Krause, Beate and Mitzlaff, Folke and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd},
  doi = {10.1007/s00778-010-0208-4},
  interhash = {57fe43734b18909a24bf5bf6608d2a09},
  intrahash = {c9437d5ec56ba949f533aeec00f571e3},
  issn = {1066-8888},
  journal = {The VLDB Journal},
  month = dec,
  number = 6,
  pages = {849--875},
  publisher = {Springer},
  title = {The Social Bookmark and Publication Management System {BibSonomy}},
  url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/benz2010social.pdf},
  volume = 19,
  year = 2010
}

@article{hotho2010publikationsmanagement,
  abstract = {Kooperative Verschlagwortungs- bzw. Social-Bookmarking-Systeme wie Delicious, Mister Wong oder auch unser eigenes System BibSonomy erfreuen sich immer gr{\"o}{\ss}erer Beliebtheit und bilden einen zentralen Bestandteil des heutigen Web 2.0. In solchen Systemen erstellen Nutzer leichtgewichtige Begriffssysteme, sogenannte Folksonomies, die die Nutzerdaten strukturieren. Die einfache Bedienbarkeit, die Allgegenw{\"a}rtigkeit, die st{\"a}ndige Verf{\"u}gbarkeit, aber auch die M{\"o}glichkeit, Gleichgesinnte spontan in solchen Systemen zu entdecken oder sie schlicht als Informationsquelle zu nutzen, sind Gr{\"u}nde f{\"u}r ihren gegenw{\"a}rtigen Erfolg. Der Artikel f{\"u}hrt den Begriff Social Bookmarking ein und diskutiert zentrale Elemente (wie Browsing und Suche) am Beispiel von BibSonomy anhand typischer Arbeitsabl{\"a}ufe eines Wissenschaftlers. Wir beschreiben die Architektur von BibSonomy sowie Wege der Integration und Vernetzung von BibSonomy mit Content-Management-Systemen und Webauftritten. Der Artikel schlie{\ss}t mit Querbez{\"u}gen zu aktuellen Forschungsfragen im Bereich Social Bookmarking.},
  author = {Hotho, Andreas and Benz, Dominik and Eisterlehner, Folke and J{\"a}schke, Robert and Krause, Beate and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd},
  file = {dpunkt Product page:http\://hmd.dpunkt.de/271/05.html:URL},
  interhash = {4555775b639fe1ec65a302a61ee6532c},
  intrahash = {250d83c41fb10b89c73f54bd7040bd6e},
  issn = {1436-3011},
  journal = {HMD -- Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  month = {#feb#},
  pages = {47-58},
  title = {{Publikationsmanagement mit BibSonomy -- ein Social-Bookmarking-System f{\"u}r Wissenschaftler}},
  volume = {Heft 271},
  year = 2010
}

@inproceedings{koerner2010thinking,
  abstract = {Recent research provides evidence for the presence of emergent semantics in collaborative tagging systems. While several methods have been proposed, little is known about the factors that influence the evolution of semantic structures in these systems. A natural hypothesis is that the quality of the emergent semantics depends on the pragmatics of tagging: Users with certain usage patterns might contribute more to the resulting semantics than others. In this work, we propose several measures which enable a pragmatic differentiation of taggers by their degree of contribution to emerging semantic structures. We distinguish between categorizers, who typically use a small set of tags as a replacement for hierarchical classification schemes, and describers, who are annotating resources with a wealth of freely associated, descriptive keywords. To study our hypothesis, we apply semantic similarity measures to 64 different partitions of a real-world and large-scale folksonomy containing different ratios of categorizers and describers. Our results not only show that ‘verbose’ taggers are most useful for the emergence  of tag semantics, but also that a subset containing only 40% of the most ‘verbose’ taggers can produce results that match and even outperform the semantic precision obtained from the whole dataset. Moreover, the results suggest that there exists a causal link between the pragmatics of tagging and resulting emergent semantics. This work is relevant for designers and analysts of tagging systems interested (i) in fostering the semantic development of their platforms, (ii) in identifying users introducing “semantic noise”, and (iii) in learning ontologies.},
  address = {Raleigh, NC, USA},
  author = {Körner, Christian and Benz, Dominik and Strohmaier, Markus and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2010)},
  interhash = {5afe6e4ce8357d8ac9698060fb438468},
  intrahash = {45f8d8f2a8251a5e988c596a5ebb3f2d},
  month = apr,
  publisher = {ACM},
  title = {Stop Thinking, start Tagging - Tag Semantics emerge from Collaborative Verbosity},
  url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/benz/papers/2010/koerner2010thinking.pdf},
  year = 2010
}

@inproceedings{mitzlaff2010visit,
  abstract = {The ongoing spread of online social networking and sharing sites has reshaped the way how people interact with each other. Analyzing the relatedness of different users within the resulting large populations of these systems plays an important role for tasks like user recommendation or community detection. Algorithms in these fields typically face the problem that explicit user relationships (like friend lists) are often very sparse. Surprisingly, implicit evidences (like click logs) of user relations have hardly been considered to this end. Based on our long-time experience with running BibSonomy [4], we identify in this paper different evidence networks of user relationships in our system. We broadly classify each network based on whether the links are explicitly established by the users (e.g., friendship or group membership) or accrue implicitly in the running system (e.g., when user u copies an entry of user v). We systematically analyze structural properties of these networks and whether topological closeness (in terms of the length of shortest paths) coincides with semantic similarity between users.},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Mitzlaff, Folke and Benz, Dominik and Stumme, Gerd and Hotho, Andreas},
  booktitle = {HT '10: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia},
  doi = {10.1145/1810617.1810664},
  interhash = {5584c4c57fcd8eb4663df8b114bcf09c},
  intrahash = {6628bf43e3834ba147a22992f2f534e9},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-0041-4},
  location = {Toronto, Ontario, Canada},
  pages = {265--270},
  publisher = {ACM},
  title = {Visit me, click me, be my friend: an analysis of evidence networks of user relationships in BibSonomy},
  url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1810617.1810664},
  year = 2010
}

@inproceedings{Jaeschke2009,
  abstract = {The challenge to provide tag recommendations for collaborative tagging systems has attracted quite some attention of researchers lately. However, most research focused on evaluation anddevelopment of appropriate methods rather than tackling the practical challenges of how to integrate recommendation methods into real tagging systems, record and evaluate their performance.In this paper we describe the tag recommendation framework we developed for our social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy. With the intention to develop, test, and evaluate recommendation algorithms and supporting cooperation with researchers, we designed the framework to be easily extensible,open for a variety of methods, and usable independent from BibSonomy. Furthermore, this paper presents an evaluation of two exemplarily deployed recommendation methods, demonstratingthe power of the framework.},
  author = {Jäschke, Robert and Eisterlehner, Folke and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, Data Mining, and Machine Learning},
  editor = {Benz, Dominik and Janssen, Frederik},
  file = {:13_Recommender.pdf:PDF},
  interhash = {440fafda1eccf4036066f457eb6674a0},
  intrahash = {5e8f40e610e723e966676772aa205f80},
  month = sep,
  pages = {44 --51},
  title = {Testing and Evaluating Tag Recommenders in a Live System},
  url = {http://lwa09.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/pub/KDML/WebHome/kdml09_R.Jaeschke_et_al.pdf},
  year = 2009
}

@incollection{hotho2008social,
  abstract = {BibSonomy ist ein kooperatives Verschlagwortungssystem (Social Bookmarking System), betrieben vom Fachgebiet Wissensverarbeitung
der Universit{\"a}t Kassel. Es erlaubt das Speichern und Organisieren von Web-Lesezeichen und Metadaten für wissenschaftlichePublikationen. In diesem Beitrag beschreiben wir die von BibSonomy bereitgestellte Funktionalit{\"a}t, die dahinter stehende Architektursowie das zugrunde liegende Datenmodell. Ferner erläutern wir Anwendungsbeispiele und gehen auf Methoden zur Analyse der in BibSonomy und ähnlichen Systemen enthaltenen Daten ein.},
  address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
  author = {Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Benz, Dominik and Grahl, Miranda and Krause, Beate and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Social Semantic Web},
  chapter = 18,
  doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-72216-8},
  editor = {Blumauer, Andreas and Pellegrini, Tassilo},
  interhash = {79dbca4289cfe913aa7f7eb7e0dccea7},
  intrahash = {5ccf05a86e7f1a089ae83dd47568e6de},
  isbn = {978-3-540-72215-1},
  issn = {1439-3107},
  pages = {363--391},
  publisher = {Springer},
  series = {X.media.press},
  title = {Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72216-8_18},
  year = 2009
}