@inproceedings{saeed2008citation,
  abstract = {New developments in the collaborative and participatory role of Web has emerged new web based fast lane information systems like tagging and bookmarking applications. Same authors have shown elsewhere, that for same papers tags and bookmarks appear and gain volume very quickly in time as compared to citations and also hold good correlation with the citations. Studying the rank prediction models based on these systems gives advantage of gaining quick insight and localizing the highly productive and diffusible knowledge very early in time. This shows that it may be interesting to model the citation rank of a paper within the scope of a conference or journal issue, based on the bookmark counts (i-e count representing how many researchers have shown interest in a publication.) We used linear regression model for predicting citation ranks and compared both predicted citation rank models of bookmark counts and coauthor network counts for the papers of WWW06 conference. The results show that the rank prediction model based on bookmark counts is far better than the one based on coauthor network with mean absolute error for the first limited to the range of 5 and mean absolute error for second model above 18. Along with this we also compared the two bookmark prediction models out of which one was based on total citations rank as a dependent variable and the other was based on the adjusted citation rank. The citation rank was adjusted after subtracting the self and coauthor citations from total citations. The comparison reveals a significant improvement in the model and correlation after adjusting the citation rank. This may be interpreted that the bookmarking mechanisms represents the phenomenon similar to global discovery of a publication. While in the coauthor nets the papers are communicated personally and this communication or selection may not be captured within the bookmarking systems.},
  author = {Saeed, A.U. and Afzal, M.T. and Latif, A. and Tochtermann, K.},
  booktitle = {Multitopic Conference, 2008. INMIC 2008. IEEE International},
  doi = {10.1109/INMIC.2008.4777769},
  interhash = {26d1785cab132d577e377bb5bf299002},
  intrahash = {677fc89fef6c79a6a4f25cb25246e38a},
  month = dec,
  pages = {392-397},
  title = {Citation rank prediction based on bookmark counts: Exploratory case study of WWW06 papers},
  url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=4777769},
  year = 2008
}

@article{haustein2011applying,
  abstract = {Web 2.0 technologies are finding their way into academics: specialized social bookmarking services allow researchers to store and share scientific literature online. By bookmarking and tagging articles, academic prosumers generate new information about resources, i.e. usage statistics and content description of scientific journals. Given the lack of global download statistics, the authors propose the application of social bookmarking data to journal evaluation. For a set of 45 physics journals all 13,608 bookmarks from CiteULike, Connotea and BibSonomy to documents published between 2004 and 2008 were analyzed. This article explores bookmarking data in \{STM\} and examines in how far it can be used to describe the perception of periodicals by the readership. Four basic indicators are defined, which analyze different aspects of usage: Usage Ratio, Usage Diffusion, Article Usage Intensity and Journal Usage Intensity. Tags are analyzed to describe a reader-specific view on journal content. },
  author = {Haustein, Stefanie and Siebenlist, Tobias},
  doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.002},
  interhash = {13fe59aae3d6ef95b529ffe00ede4126},
  intrahash = {c3e49ee7b0ed81ecd126d3ef76d5f407},
  issn = {1751-1577},
  journal = {Journal of Informetrics },
  number = 3,
  pages = {446 - 457},
  title = {Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage },
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157711000393},
  volume = 5,
  year = 2011
}

@phdthesis{jaschke2011formal,
  address = {Heidelberg},
  author = {Jäschke, Robert},
  interhash = {dcb2cd1cd72ae45d77c4d8755d199405},
  intrahash = {bad02a0bbbf066907ecdee0ecaf9fb80},
  isbn = {1-60750-707-2},
  publisher = {Akad. Verl.-Ges. AKA},
  series = {Dissertations in artificial intelligence},
  title = {Formal concept analysis and tag recommendations in collaborative tagging systems},
  url = {http://opac.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/DB=1/PPN?PPN=231779038},
  volume = 332,
  year = 2011
}

@inproceedings{lipczak2010impact,
  abstract = {Collaborative tagging systems are popular tools for organization, sharing and retrieval of web resources. Their success is due to their freedom and simplicity of use. To post a resource, the user should only define a set of tags that would position the resource in the system's data structure -- folksonomy. This data structure can serve as a rich source of information about relations between tags and concepts they represent. To make use of information collaboratively added to folksonomies, we need to understand how users make tagging decisions. Three factors that are believed to influence user tagging decisions are: the tags used by other users, the organization of user's personal repository and the knowledge model shared between users. In our work we examine the role of another potential factor -- resource title. Despite all the advantages of tags, tagging is a tedious process. To minimize the effort, users are likely to tag with keywords that are easily available. We show that resource title, as a source of useful tags, is easy to access and comprehend. Given a choice of two tags with the same meaning, users are likely to be influenced by their presence in the title. However, a factor that seems to have stronger impact on users' tagging decisions is maintaining the consistency of the personal profile of tags. The results of our study reveal a new, less idealistic picture of collaborative tagging systems, in which the collaborative aspect seems to be less important than personal gains and convenience.},
  acmid = {1810648},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Lipczak, Marek and Milios, Evangelos},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia},
  doi = {10.1145/1810617.1810648},
  interhash = {a999b5f2eace0cd75028e57261afe3d7},
  intrahash = {71dd1a473eaf0af9840758653746c221},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-0041-4},
  location = {Toronto, Ontario, Canada},
  numpages = {10},
  pages = {179--188},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {HT '10},
  title = {The Impact of Resource Title on Tags in Collaborative Tagging Systems},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1810617.1810648},
  year = 2010
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2014social,
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 23rd International World Wide Web Conference},
  interhash = {9223d6d728612c8c05a80b5edceeb78b},
  intrahash = {11fab5468dd4b4e3db662ea5e68df8e0},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {WWW 2014},
  title = {How Social is Social Tagging?},
  year = 2014
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2014social,
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 23rd International World Wide Web Conference},
  interhash = {9223d6d728612c8c05a80b5edceeb78b},
  intrahash = {11fab5468dd4b4e3db662ea5e68df8e0},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {WWW 2014},
  title = {How Social is Social Tagging?},
  year = 2014
}

@misc{doerfel2014course,
  abstract = {Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in
today's web and have attracted the interest from our research community in a
variety of investigations. The overall vision of our community is that simply
through interactions with the system, i.e., through tagging and sharing of
resources, users would contribute to building useful semantic structures as
well as resource indexes using uncontrolled vocabulary not only due to the
easy-to-use mechanics. Henceforth, a variety of assumptions about social
tagging systems have emerged, yet testing them has been difficult due to the
absence of suitable data. In this work we thoroughly investigate three
available assumptions - e.g., is a tagging system really social? - by examining
live log data gathered from the real-world public social tagging system
BibSonomy. Our empirical results indicate that while some of these assumptions
hold to a certain extent, other assumptions need to be reflected and viewed in
a very critical light. Our observations have implications for the design of
future search and other algorithms to better reflect the actual user behavior.},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus},
  interhash = {65f287480af20fc407f7d26677f17b72},
  intrahash = {988ea3a9b85ec0656e27750e4080325c},
  note = {cite arxiv:1401.0629},
  title = {Of course we share! Testing Assumptions about Social Tagging Systems},
  url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.0629},
  year = 2014
}

@inproceedings{heckner2009personal,
  address = {San Jose, CA, USA},
  author = {Heckner, Markus and Heilemann, Michael and Wolff, Christian},
  booktitle = {Int'l AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM)},
  interhash = {f954e699dc6ca2d0abbe5f6ebe166dc7},
  intrahash = {d1074484ea350ad88400fe4fc6984874},
  month = may,
  title = {Personal Information Management vs. Resource Sharing: Towards a Model of Information Behaviour in Social Tagging Systems},
  year = 2009
}

@techreport{doerfel2014course,
  abstract = {Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in
today's web and have attracted the interest from our research community in a
variety of investigations. The overall vision of our community is that simply
through interactions with the system, i.e., through tagging and sharing of
resources, users would contribute to building useful semantic structures as
well as resource indexes using uncontrolled vocabulary not only due to the
easy-to-use mechanics. Henceforth, a variety of assumptions about social
tagging systems have emerged, yet testing them has been difficult due to the
absence of suitable data. In this work we thoroughly investigate three
available assumptions - e.g., is a tagging system really social? - by examining
live log data gathered from the real-world public social tagging system
BibSonomy. Our empirical results indicate that while some of these assumptions
hold to a certain extent, other assumptions need to be reflected and viewed in
a very critical light. Our observations have implications for the design of
future search and other algorithms to better reflect the actual user behavior.},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus},
  interhash = {65f287480af20fc407f7d26677f17b72},
  intrahash = {e360f0bd207806e72305efe16491ebe3},
  note = {cite arxiv:1401.0629},
  title = {Of course we share! Testing Assumptions about Social Tagging Systems},
  url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.0629},
  year = 2014
}

@article{landia2013deeper,
  abstract = {The information contained in social tagging systems is often modelled as a graph of connections between users, items and tags. Recommendation algorithms such as FolkRank, have the potential to leverage complex relationships in the data, corresponding to multiple hops in the graph. We present an in-depth analysis and evaluation of graph models for social tagging data and propose novel adaptations and extensions of FolkRank to improve tag recommendations. We highlight implicit assumptions made by the widely used folksonomy model, and propose an alternative and more accurate graph-representation of the data. Our extensions of FolkRank address the new item problem by incorporating content data into the algorithm, and significantly improve prediction results on unpruned datasets. Our adaptations address issues in the iterative weight spreading calculation that potentially hinder FolkRank's ability to leverage the deep graph as an information source. Moreover, we evaluate the benefit of considering each deeper level of the graph, and present important insights regarding the characteristics of social tagging data in general. Our results suggest that the base assumption made by conventional weight propagation methods, that closeness in the graph always implies a positive relationship, does not hold for the social tagging domain.},
  author = {Landia, Nikolas and Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert and Anand, Sarabjot Singh and Hotho, Andreas and Griffiths, Nathan},
  interhash = {e8095b13630452ce3ecbae582f32f4bc},
  intrahash = {e585a92994be476480545eb62d741642},
  journal = {cs.IR},
  title = {Deeper Into the Folksonomy Graph: FolkRank Adaptations and Extensions for Improved Tag Recommendations},
  url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1498},
  volume = {1310.1498},
  year = 2013
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2013analysis,
  abstract = {Since the rise of collaborative tagging systems on the web, the tag recommendation task -- suggesting suitable tags to users of such systems while they add resources to their collection -- has been tackled. However, the (offline) evaluation of tag recommendation algorithms usually suffers from difficulties like the sparseness of the data or the cold start problem for new resources or users. Previous studies therefore often used so-called post-cores (specific subsets of the original datasets) for their experiments. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale experiment in which we analyze different tag recommendation algorithms on different cores of three real-world datasets. We show, that a recommender's performance depends on the particular core and explore correlations between performances on different cores.},
  acmid = {2507222},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems},
  doi = {10.1145/2507157.2507222},
  interhash = {3eaf2beb1cdad39b7c5735a82c3338dd},
  intrahash = {aa4b3d79a362d7415aaa77625b590dfa},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-2409-0},
  location = {Hong Kong, China},
  numpages = {4},
  pages = {343--346},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {RecSys '13},
  title = {An analysis of tag-recommender evaluation procedures},
  url = {https://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/doerfel2013analysis.pdf},
  year = 2013
}

@article{landia2013deeper,
  abstract = {The information contained in social tagging systems is often modelled as a graph of connections between users, items and tags. Recommendation algorithms such as FolkRank, have the potential to leverage complex relationships in the data, corresponding to multiple hops in the graph. We present an in-depth analysis and evaluation of graph models for social tagging data and propose novel adaptations and extensions of FolkRank to improve tag recommendations. We highlight implicit assumptions made by the widely used folksonomy model, and propose an alternative and more accurate graph-representation of the data. Our extensions of FolkRank address the new item problem by incorporating content data into the algorithm, and significantly improve prediction results on unpruned datasets. Our adaptations address issues in the iterative weight spreading calculation that potentially hinder FolkRank's ability to leverage the deep graph as an information source. Moreover, we evaluate the benefit of considering each deeper level of the graph, and present important insights regarding the characteristics of social tagging data in general. Our results suggest that the base assumption made by conventional weight propagation methods, that closeness in the graph always implies a positive relationship, does not hold for the social tagging domain.},
  author = {Landia, Nikolas and Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert and Anand, Sarabjot Singh and Hotho, Andreas and Griffiths, Nathan},
  interhash = {e8095b13630452ce3ecbae582f32f4bc},
  intrahash = {e585a92994be476480545eb62d741642},
  journal = {cs.IR},
  title = {Deeper Into the Folksonomy Graph: FolkRank Adaptations and Extensions for Improved Tag Recommendations},
  url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1498},
  volume = {1310.1498},
  year = 2013
}

@book{balbymarinho2012recommender,
  abstract = {Social Tagging Systems are web applications in which users upload resources (e.g., bookmarks, videos, photos, etc.) and annotate it with a list of freely chosen keywords called tags. This is a grassroots approach to organize a site and help users to find the resources they are interested in. Social tagging systems are open and inherently social; features that have been proven to encourage participation. However, with the large popularity of these systems and the increasing amount of user-contributed content, information overload rapidly becomes an issue. Recommender Systems are well known applications for increasing the level of relevant content over the “noise” that continuously grows as more and more content becomes available online. In social tagging systems, however, we face new challenges. While in classic recommender systems the mode of recommendation is basically the resource, in social tagging systems there are three possible modes of recommendation: users, resources, or tags. Therefore suitable methods that properly exploit the different dimensions of social tagging systems data are needed. In this book, we survey the most recent and state-of-the-art work about a whole new generation of recommender systems built to serve social tagging systems. The book is divided into self-contained chapters covering the background material on social tagging systems and recommender systems to the more advanced techniques like the ones based on tensor factorization and graph-based models.},
  author = {Balby Marinho, L. and Hotho, A. and Jäschke, R. and Nanopoulos, A. and Rendle, S. and Schmidt-Thieme, L. and Stumme, G. and Symeonidis, P.},
  doi = {10.1007/978-1-4614-1894-8},
  interhash = {0bb7f0588cd690d67cc73e219a3a24fa},
  intrahash = {87d6883ebd98e8810be45d7e7e4ade96},
  isbn = {978-1-4614-1893-1},
  month = feb,
  publisher = {Springer},
  series = {SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering},
  title = {Recommender Systems for Social Tagging Systems},
  url = {http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-1894-8},
  year = 2012
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2012leveraging,
  abstract = {The ever-growing flood of new scientific articles requires novel retrieval mechanisms. One means for mitigating this instance of the information overload phenomenon are collaborative tagging systems, that allow users to select, share and annotate references to publications. These systems employ recommendation algorithms to present to their users personalized lists of interesting and relevant publications. In this paper we analyze different ways to incorporate social data and metadata from collaborative tagging systems into the graph-based ranking algorithm FolkRank to utilize it for recommending scientific articles to users of the social bookmarking system BibSonomy. We compare the results to those of Collaborative Filtering, which has previously been applied for resource recommendation.},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th ACM RecSys workshop on Recommender systems and the social web},
  doi = {10.1145/2365934.2365937},
  interhash = {beb2c81daf975eeed6e01e1b412196b1},
  intrahash = {64bf590675a833770b7d284871435a8d},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-1638-5},
  location = {Dublin, Ireland},
  month = sep,
  pages = {9--16},
  publisher = {ACM},
  title = {Leveraging Publication Metadata and Social Data into FolkRank for Scientific Publication Recommendation },
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2365934.2365937},
  year = 2012
}

@inproceedings{chi2009augmented,
  abstract = {We are experiencing a new Social Web, where people share, communicate, commiserate, and conflict with each other. As evidenced by systems like Wikipedia, twitter, and delicious.com, these environments are turning people into social information foragers and sharers. Groups interact to resolve conflicts and jointly make sense of topic areas from "Obama vs. Clinton" to "Islam."</p> <p>PARC's Augmented Social Cognition researchers -- who come from cognitive psychology, computer science, HCI, CSCW, and other disciplines -- focus on understanding how to "enhance a group of people's ability to remember, think, and reason". Through Social Web systems like social bookmarking sites, blogs, Wikis, and more, we can finally study, in detail, these types of enhancements on a very large scale.</p> <p>Here we summarize recent work and early findings such as: (1) how conflict and coordination have played out in Wikipedia, and how social transparency might affect reader trust; (2) how decreasing interaction costs might change participation in social tagging systems; and (3) how computation can help organize user-generated content and metadata.},
  acmid = {1559959},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Chi, Ed H.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data},
  doi = {10.1145/1559845.1559959},
  interhash = {d24a64ce5e95bae4de9329a467342dee},
  intrahash = {d09b484b1036ca8273743cac1992dd7f},
  isbn = {978-1-60558-551-2},
  location = {Providence, Rhode Island, USA},
  numpages = {12},
  pages = {973--984},
  publisher = {ACM},
  title = {Augmented social cognition: using social web technology to enhance the ability of groups to remember, think, and reason},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1559845.1559959},
  year = 2009
}

@inproceedings{Doerfel:2012:LPM:2365934.2365937,
  abstract = {The ever-growing flood of new scientific articles requires novel retrieval mechanisms. One means for mitigating this instance of the information overload phenomenon are collaborative tagging systems, that allow users to select, share and annotate references to publications. These systems employ recommendation algorithms to present to their users personalized lists of interesting and relevant publications. In this paper we analyze different ways to incorporate social data and metadata from collaborative tagging systems into the graph-based ranking algorithm FolkRank to utilize it for recommending scientific articles to users of the social bookmarking system BibSonomy. We compare the results to those of Collaborative Filtering, which has previously been applied for resource recommendation.},
  acmid = {2365937},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th ACM RecSys workshop on Recommender systems and the social web},
  doi = {10.1145/2365934.2365937},
  interhash = {beb2c81daf975eeed6e01e1b412196b1},
  intrahash = {e5c2266da34a9167352615827cc4670d},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-1638-5},
  location = {Dublin, Ireland},
  numpages = {8},
  pages = {9--16},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {RSWeb '12},
  title = {Leveraging publication metadata and social data into FolkRank for scientific publication recommendation},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2365934.2365937},
  year = 2012
}

@inproceedings{Landia:2012:EFC:2365934.2365936,
  abstract = {Real-world tagging datasets have a large proportion of new/ untagged documents. Few approaches for recommending tags to a user for a document address this new item problem, concentrating instead on artificially created post-core datasets where it is guaranteed that the user as well as the document of each test post is known to the system and already has some tags assigned to it. In order to recommend tags for new documents, approaches are required which model documents not only based on the tags assigned to them in the past (if any), but also the content. In this paper we present a novel adaptation to the widely recognised FolkRank tag recommendation algorithm by including content data. We adapt the FolkRank graph to use word nodes instead of document nodes, enabling it to recommend tags for new documents based on their textual content. Our adaptations make FolkRank applicable to post-core 1 ie. the full real-world tagging datasets and address the new item problem in tag recommendation. For comparison, we also apply and evaluate the same methodology of including content on a simpler tag recommendation algorithm. This results in a less expensive recommender which suggests a combination of user related and document content related tags.</p> <p>Including content data into FolkRank shows an improvement over plain FolkRank on full tagging datasets. However, we also observe that our simpler content-aware tag recommender outperforms FolkRank with content data. Our results suggest that an optimisation of the weighting method of FolkRank is required to achieve better results.},
  acmid = {2365936},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Landia, Nikolas and Anand, Sarabjot Singh and Hotho, Andreas and J\"{a}schke, Robert and Doerfel, Stephan and Mitzlaff, Folke},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th ACM RecSys workshop on Recommender systems and the social web},
  doi = {10.1145/2365934.2365936},
  interhash = {2ce2874d37fd3b90c9f6a46a7a08e94b},
  intrahash = {a97bf903435d6fc4fc61e2bb7e3913b9},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-1638-5},
  location = {Dublin, Ireland},
  numpages = {8},
  pages = {1--8},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {RSWeb '12},
  title = {Extending FolkRank with content data},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2365934.2365936},
  year = 2012
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2012leveraging,
  abstract = {The ever-growing flood of new scientific articles requires novel retrieval mechanisms. One means for mitigating this instance of the information overload phenomenon are collaborative tagging systems, that allow users to select, share and annotate references to publications. These systems employ recommendation algorithms to present to their users personalized lists of interesting and relevant publications. In this paper we analyze different ways to incorporate social data and metadata from collaborative tagging systems into the graph-based ranking algorithm FolkRank to utilize it for recommending scientific articles to users of the social bookmarking system BibSonomy. We compare the results to those of Collaborative Filtering, which has previously been applied for resource recommendation.},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th ACM RecSys workshop on Recommender systems and the social web},
  doi = {10.1145/2365934.2365937},
  interhash = {beb2c81daf975eeed6e01e1b412196b1},
  intrahash = {64bf590675a833770b7d284871435a8d},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-1638-5},
  location = {Dublin, Ireland},
  month = sep,
  pages = {9--16},
  publisher = {ACM},
  title = {Leveraging Publication Metadata and Social Data into FolkRank for Scientific Publication Recommendation },
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2365934.2365937},
  year = 2012
}

@inproceedings{landia2012extending,
  abstract = {Real-world tagging datasets have a large proportion of new/ untagged documents. Few approaches for recommending tags to a user for a document address this new item problem, concentrating instead on artificially created post-core datasets where it is guaranteed that the user as well as the document of each test post is known to the system and already has some tags assigned to it. In order to recommend tags for new documents, approaches are required which model documents not only based on the tags assigned to them in the past (if any), but also the content. In this paper we present a novel adaptation to the widely recognised FolkRank tag recommendation algorithm by including content data. We adapt the FolkRank graph to use word nodes instead of document nodes, enabling it to recommend tags for new documents based on their textual content. Our adaptations make FolkRank applicable to post-core 1 ie. the full real-world tagging datasets and address the new item problem in tag recommendation. For comparison, we also apply and evaluate the same methodology of including content on a simpler tag recommendation algorithm. This results in a less expensive recommender which suggests a combination of user related and document content related tags.  Including content data into FolkRank shows an improvement over plain FolkRank on full tagging datasets. However, we also observe that our simpler content-aware tag recommender outperforms FolkRank with content data. Our results suggest that an optimisation of the weighting method of FolkRank is required to achieve better results.},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Landia, Nikolas and Anand, Sarabjot Singh and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Doerfel, Stephan and Mitzlaff, Folke},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th ACM RecSys workshop on Recommender systems and the social web},
  doi = {10.1145/2365934.2365936},
  interhash = {7400e35f8d412d15722fe3399aba14a3},
  intrahash = {b16dabcd7e17b673c34608ac820ce3c7},
  isbn = {978-1-4503-1638-5},
  location = {Dublin, Ireland},
  month = sep,
  pages = {1--8},
  publisher = {ACM},
  title = {Extending FolkRank with Content Data},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2365934.2365936},
  year = 2012
}

@mastersthesis{flohr2011extraktion,
  abstract = {Informationen so aufzubereiten, dass sie für eine bestimmte Situation nützlich sind, ist eine große Herausforderung. In solchen Situationen soll ein Benutzer, wenn er sich an einem fremden Ort befindet, mit Hilfe des Android Smartphone interessante und wis- senswerte Informationen anzeigen lassen. Um dies bewerkstelligen zu können, muss es eine georeferenzierte Informationsquelle geben. Außerdem muss ein Konzept vor- handen sein, um diese Daten zu sammeln und so aufzubereiten, dass der Benutzer diese auch nützlich findet. Es muss eine Visualisierung dieser Daten geben, da der Platz zur Anzeige auf Smartphones sehr begrenzt ist. Als georeferenzierte Informationsquelle wird die Online-Enzyklopädie Wikipedia ge- nutzt, diese ist frei zugänglich und auch sehr umfassend. In dieser Arbeit wird das Konzept zur Sammlung und Aufbereitung von relevanten Daten behandelt. Zur In- formationsvisualisierung wird die Methode der Schlagwortwolke (engl. Tag-Cloud) verwendet.   It is a major challenge to prepare useful information for a particular situation. In this situation an Android smartphone user wants to display interesting and important facts about an unknown place. To manage this task existence of a geo-referenced source of information has to be ensured. In order to collect and prepare this data a creation of concept is needed. Due to limited display space, it is necessary to construct a suitable visualization of this data. Wikipedia is used as a geo-referenced information resource, because it has open-access and it offers global geo-referenced information. This thesis covers the concept of col- lecting and preparing relevant data. To visualize information a tag cloud is used.  },
  author = {Flohr, Oliver},
  interhash = {5d1f4da4964062ed6598fe8d8be8b591},
  intrahash = {a28959724af1907e7fc67a68e648c14c},
  month = aug,
  school = {Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover},
  title = {Extraktion und Visualisierung ortsbezogener Informationen mit Tag-Clouds},
  type = {bachelor thesis},
  url = {http://www.se.uni-hannover.de/pub/File/pdfpapers/Flohr2011a.pdf},
  year = 2011
}