@article{fu2014academic,
  abstract = {By means of their academic publications, authors form a social network. Instead of sharing casual thoughts and photos (as in Facebook), authors select co-authors and reference papers written by other authors. Thanks to various efforts (such as Microsoft Academic Search and DBLP), the data necessary for analyzing the academic social network is becoming more available on the Internet. What type of information and queries would be useful for users to discover, beyond the search queries already available from services such as Google Scholar? In this paper, we explore this question by defining a variety of ranking metrics on different entities—authors, publication venues, and institutions. We go beyond traditional metrics such as paper counts, citations, and h-index. Specifically, we define metrics such as },
  author = {Fu, TomZ.J. and Song, Qianqian and Chiu, DahMing},
  doi = {10.1007/s11192-014-1356-x},
  interhash = {a39d784173e693ac65979737e96c2a3c},
  intrahash = {de2f3434421912af52e355578e147b0a},
  issn = {0138-9130},
  journal = {Scientometrics},
  language = {English},
  number = 1,
  pages = {203-239},
  publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
  title = {The academic social network},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1356-x},
  volume = 101,
  year = 2014
}

@article{haley2014ranking,
  abstract = {Recently, Harzing's Publish or Perish software was updated to include Microsoft Academic Search as a second citation database search option for computing various citation-based metrics. This article explores the new search option by scoring 50 top economics and finance journals and comparing them with the results obtained using the original Google Scholar-based search option. The new database delivers significantly smaller scores for all metrics, but the rank correlations across the two databases for the h-index, g-index, AWCR, and e-index are significantly correlated, especially when the time frame is restricted to more recent years. Comparisons are also made to the Article Influence score from eigenfactor.org and to the RePEc h-index, both of which adjust for journal-level self-citations.},
  author = {Haley, M. Ryan},
  doi = {10.1002/asi.23080},
  interhash = {4c6796cff62fe5c8a8cf638f9785cd14},
  intrahash = {29feb827b9f64fa5828eb4e6298d38f7},
  issn = {2330-1643},
  journal = {Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology},
  number = 5,
  pages = {1079--1084},
  title = {Ranking top economics and finance journals using Microsoft academic search versus Google scholar: How does the new publish or perish option compare?},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23080},
  volume = 65,
  year = 2014
}

@misc{ordunamalea2014empirical,
  abstract = {The goal of this working paper is to summarize the main empirical evidences
provided by the scientific community as regards the comparison between the two
main citation based academic search engines: Google Scholar and Microsoft
Academic Search, paying special attention to the following issues: coverage,
correlations between journal rankings, and usage of these academic search
engines. Additionally, selfelaborated data is offered, which are intended to
provide current evidence about the popularity of these tools on the Web, by
measuring the number of rich files PDF, PPT and DOC in which these tools are
mentioned, the amount of external links that both products receive, and the
search queries frequency from Google Trends. The poor results obtained by MAS
led us to an unexpected and unnoticed discovery: Microsoft Academic Search is
outdated since 2013. Therefore, the second part of the working paper aims at
advancing some data demonstrating this lack of update. For this purpose we
gathered the number of total records indexed by Microsoft Academic Search since
2000. The data shows an abrupt drop in the number of documents indexed from
2,346,228 in 2010 to 8,147 in 2013 and 802 in 2014. This decrease is offered
according to 15 thematic areas as well. In view of these problems it seems
logical not only that Microsoft Academic Searchwas poorly used to search for
articles by academics and students, who mostly use Google or Google Scholar,
but virtually ignored by bibliometricians},
  author = {Orduna-Malea, Enrique and Ayllon, Juan Manuel and Martin-Martin, Alberto and Lopez-Cozar, Emilio Delgado},
  interhash = {4502aa3a64de2197a1a3724d2ed43f8d},
  intrahash = {ab883378446caed67ceb55ab219917ee},
  note = {cite arxiv:1404.7045Comment: 14 pages, 7 figures, 6 tables},
  title = {Empirical Evidences in Citation-Based Search Engines: Is Microsoft
  Academic Search dead?},
  url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7045},
  year = 2014
}

@article{Borys.2008,
  abstract = {Steht ein Mensch mit geschlossenen Augen in der freien Natur, dann kann er sich schon allein aus dem, was er hört, ein Bild der Umgebung machen. Er hört dabei dreidimensional in Richtung und Entfernung. Wir wollen dieses dreidimensionale Hörerlebnis in einer technischen Umgebung zumindest teilweise zurückgeben. Wir hoffen, dass es Piloten dabei unterstützt, ein Bild ihrer Umgebung und ihrer eigenen Position darin aufzubauen. Unsere Lösung und der Aufbau zur experimentellen Überprüfung wird im Folgenden beschrieben.
With closed eyes in the nature, humans can sense the surrounding just by listening. Listening is three-dimensional providing direction and distance clues. We try to provide at least part of this perception in technical settings. We expect to support aircraft pilots' awareness of situation and own position. We describe our solution and the means for an experimental evaluation in the following paper.},
  author = {Borys, Bernd-Burkhard},
  interhash = {1a9c0b911acc981451a3584fb23677e8},
  intrahash = {2022d3e5b1fbc7841b5d1c47ffc9cd59},
  journal = {i-com},
  number = 1,
  pages = {30-33},
  title = {Ein Cockpit-Mockup zur Evaluierung auditiver Flugführungsanzeigen (A Cockpit Mockup for the Evaluation of Auditory Flight Instruments)},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/icom.2008.0006},
  volume = 7,
  year = 2008
}

@inproceedings{Borys.2004,
  abstract = {Abstract: The paper describes an auditory interface using directional sound as a possible support for pilots during approach in an instrument landing scenario. Several ways of producing directional sounds are illustrated. One using speaker pairs and controlling power distribution between speakers is evaluated experimentally. Results show, that power alone is insufficient for positioning single isolated sound events, although discrimination in the horizontal plane performs better than in the vertical. Additional sound parameters to compensate for this are proposed. Abstract: The paper describes an auditory interface using directional sound as a possible support for pilots during approach in an instrument landing scenario. Several ways of producing directional sounds are illustrated. One using speaker pairs and controlling power distribution between speakers is evaluated experimentally. Results show, that power alone is insufficient for positioning single isolated sound events, although discrimination in the horizontal plane performs better than in the vertical. Additional sound parameters to compensate for this are proposed. 
},
  address = {Oxford},
  author = {Borys, Bernd-Burkhard},
  booktitle = {Automated systems based on human skill and knowledge 2003},
  editor = {Stahre, Johan and Mårtenson, Lena},
  interhash = {bb7b53da8e1c8f420c1d23ab07d46bbb},
  intrahash = {c6bce6a3d355ecd8e82decf5f9394529},
  pages = {129–134},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  title = {Evaluation of auditory displays supporting aircraft approach and landing},
  url = {http://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-200603087236},
  year = 2004
}

@misc{Borys.2007,
  author = {Borys, Bernd-Burkhard},
  interhash = {aff723972fea8b52b3ed587a70a7c132},
  intrahash = {30010dcafc5a3794ef622664d7bcf4a9},
  title = {Microsoft's Flight Simulator and DirectX to Drive Auditory Displays in a Cockpit Mockup: Poster: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting (Braunschweig 2007)},
  year = 2007
}

@incollection{Borys.2001b,
  address = {Lyngby},
  author = {Borys, Bernd-Burkhard},
  booktitle = {Human Decision Making and Manual Control},
  editor = {Lind, Morten},
  interhash = {f0a3863453903aa9463dbed4118ab4d9},
  intrahash = {980513b85379f1c42f832531ae5db18d},
  isbn = {8787950898},
  publisher = {DTU},
  series = {European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control},
  title = {Hardware, Software, and Experiments for Auditory Displays},
  volume = 20,
  year = 2001
}

@article{Borys.2008,
  abstract = {Steht ein Mensch mit geschlossenen Augen in der freien Natur, dann kann er sich schon allein aus dem, was er hört, ein Bild der Umgebung machen. Er hört dabei dreidimensional in Richtung und Entfernung. Wir wollen dieses dreidimensionale Hörerlebnis in einer technischen Umgebung zumindest teilweise zurückgeben. Wir hoffen, dass es Piloten dabei unterstützt, ein Bild ihrer Umgebung und ihrer eigenen Position darin aufzubauen. Unsere Lösung und der Aufbau zur experimentellen Überprüfung wird im Folgenden beschrieben.
With closed eyes in the nature, humans can sense the surrounding just by listening. Listening is three-dimensional providing direction and distance clues. We try to provide at least part of this perception in technical settings. We expect to support aircraft pilots' awareness of situation and own position. We describe our solution and the means for an experimental evaluation in the following paper.},
  author = {Borys, Bernd-Burkhard},
  interhash = {1a9c0b911acc981451a3584fb23677e8},
  intrahash = {2022d3e5b1fbc7841b5d1c47ffc9cd59},
  journal = {i-com},
  number = 1,
  pages = {30-33},
  title = {Ein Cockpit-Mockup zur Evaluierung auditiver Flugführungsanzeigen (A Cockpit Mockup for the Evaluation of Auditory Flight Instruments)},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/icom.2008.0006},
  volume = 7,
  year = 2008
}