@inproceedings{singer2015hyptrails,
  address = {Firenze, Italy},
  author = {Singer, P. and Helic, D. and Hotho, A. and Strohmaier, M.},
  booktitle = {24th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2015)},
  interhash = {d33e150aa37dcd618388960286f8a46a},
  intrahash = {5d21e53dc91b35a4a6cb6b9ec858045d},
  month = {May 18 - May 22},
  organization = {ACM},
  publisher = {ACM},
  title = {Hyptrails: A bayesian approach for comparing hypotheses about human trails},
  url = {http://www.www2015.it/documents/proceedings/proceedings/p1003.pdf},
  year = 2015
}

@article{sun2013social,
  author = {Sun, Xiaoling and Kaur, Jasleen and Milojevic, Stasa and Flammini, Alessandro and Menczer, Filippo},
  comment = {10.1038/srep01069},
  interhash = {5cd31392e997555d78596f962044f84b},
  intrahash = {ed28353b082f3ccbd23ea85ea9d7c8e5},
  journal = {Sci. Rep.},
  month = jan,
  publisher = {Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved},
  title = {Social Dynamics of Science},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01069},
  volume = 3,
  year = 2013
}

@article{haustein2011applying,
  abstract = {Web 2.0 technologies are finding their way into academics: specialized social bookmarking services allow researchers to store and share scientific literature online. By bookmarking and tagging articles, academic prosumers generate new information about resources, i.e. usage statistics and content description of scientific journals. Given the lack of global download statistics, the authors propose the application of social bookmarking data to journal evaluation. For a set of 45 physics journals all 13,608 bookmarks from CiteULike, Connotea and BibSonomy to documents published between 2004 and 2008 were analyzed. This article explores bookmarking data in \{STM\} and examines in how far it can be used to describe the perception of periodicals by the readership. Four basic indicators are defined, which analyze different aspects of usage: Usage Ratio, Usage Diffusion, Article Usage Intensity and Journal Usage Intensity. Tags are analyzed to describe a reader-specific view on journal content. },
  author = {Haustein, Stefanie and Siebenlist, Tobias},
  doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.002},
  interhash = {13fe59aae3d6ef95b529ffe00ede4126},
  intrahash = {c3e49ee7b0ed81ecd126d3ef76d5f407},
  issn = {1751-1577},
  journal = {Journal of Informetrics },
  number = 3,
  pages = {446 - 457},
  title = {Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage },
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157711000393},
  volume = 5,
  year = 2011
}

@article{steenweg2010publikationsmanagement,
  abstract = {An den Hochschulen kommt der Förderung einer zeitgemäßen Publikationsumgebung steigende Bedeutung zu. Die Interessenlage ist vielschichtig. Autoren möchten eine komfortable Arbeitsumgebung, die Hochschulpräsidien benötigen Forschungsinformationen und die Bibliotheken wollen passende Informationsinfrastrukturen bereitzustellen. An der Universität Kassel wurde ausgehend vom Bedürfnis des wissenschaftlichen Autors in einem Pilotprojekt (PUMA) versucht, diese Interessen zu einem Publikationsmanagement zu vereinbaren. Für den Autor wird in PUMA bei deutlich geringerem Einsatz ein erheblicher Mehrwert dadurch generiert, dass bei nur einmaligen Anmelden mit dem Bibliotheks-Account ein Social-Bookmarking-System (BibSonomy) zur Verfügung steht, automatisiert Informationen an den Forschungsbericht weitergegeben, Metadaten und Dateien in Repositorien gestellt und Schriftenverzeichnisse (Curriculum Vitae) für Homepages etc. erstellt werden können.},
  author = {Steenweg, Helge},
  interhash = {f7b1d913b85a3d4b5ae1256c77ffa9e5},
  intrahash = {bca65ebab3f638fae16a46620c4fb08a},
  journal = {ABI-Technik},
  number = 2,
  pages = {130-138.},
  title = {Publikationsmanagement - eine wichtige zukünftige Aufgabe an Hochschulen. Wie sind Forschungsbericht, Institutional Repository und die Interessen des wissenschaftlichen Autors vereinbar? - Das Projekt PUMA},
  volume = 30,
  year = 2010
}

@inproceedings{doerfel2014evaluating,
  author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus},
  bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, http://dblp.org},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 16th {LWA} Workshops: KDML, {IR} and FGWM, Aachen,               Germany, September 8-10, 2014.},
  editor = {Seidl, Thomas and Hassani, Marwan and Beecks, Christian},
  interhash = {955cd7c6f7652b7c531b699464925b1f},
  intrahash = {4b2e73c82b5a84e1959ad66aaad4a235},
  pages = {18--19},
  publisher = {CEUR-WS.org},
  title = {Evaluating Assumptions about Social Tagging - {A} Study of User Behavior
               in BibSonomy},
  url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1226/paper06.pdf},
  year = 2014
}