@article{white1981author, abstract = {It is shown that the mapping of a particular area of science, in this case information science, can be done using authors as units of analysis and the cocitations of pairs of authors as the variable that indicates their “distances” from each other. The analysis assumes that the more two authors are cited together, the closer the relationship between them. The raw data are cocitation counts drawn online from Social Scisearch (Social Sciences Citation Index) over the period 1972–1979. The resulting map shows (1) identifiable author groups (akin to “schools”) of information science, (2) locations of these groups with respect to each other, (3) the degree of centrality and peripherality of authors within groups, (4) proximities of authors within group and across group boundaries (“border authors” who seem to connect various areas of research), and (5) positions of authors with respect to the map's axes, which were arbitrarily set spanning the most divergent groups in order to aid interpretation. Cocitation analysis of authors offers a new technique that might contribute to the understanding of intellectual structure in the sciences and possibly in other areas to the extent that those areas rely on serial publications. The technique establishes authors, as well as documents, as an effective unit in analyzing subject specialties.}, author = {White, Howard D. and Griffith, Belver C.}, doi = {10.1002/asi.4630320302}, interhash = {9d5d0acf1873abf4f57eddd875b8ad90}, intrahash = {c44a512137b3e8f3f8c9c91e9c7b4a95}, issn = {1097-4571}, journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science}, number = 3, pages = {163--171}, publisher = {Wiley}, title = {Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302}, volume = 32, year = 1981 } @article{small1973cocitation, abstract = {A new form of document coupling called co-citation is defined as the frequency with which two documents are cited together. The co-citation frequency of two scientific papers can be determined by comparing lists of citing documents in the Science Citation Index and counting identical entries. Networks of co-cited papers can be generated for specific scientific specialties, and an example is drawn from the literature of particle physics. Co-citation patterns are found to differ significantly from bibliographic coupling patterns, but to agree generally with patterns of direct citation. Clusters of co-cited papers provide a new way to study the specialty structure of science. They may provide a new approach to indexing and to the creation of SDI profiles.}, author = {Small, Henry}, doi = {10.1002/asi.4630240406}, interhash = {dfbb7636c96853cc258878548c12d12f}, intrahash = {1dc18dfe50667ff19d5cfa9d52d3e37b}, issn = {1097-4571}, journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science}, number = 4, pages = {265--269}, publisher = {Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company}, title = {Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406}, volume = 24, year = 1973 }