The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance.

@inproceedings{benz2008analyzing, author = {Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin}, title = {Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems}, editor = {Alani, Harith and Staab, Steffen and Stumme, Gerd}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Social Web Communities}, year = {2008}, number = {08391}, url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/benz2008analyzing.pdf}, keywords = {2008, ol_web2.0, itegpub, iin2009, tagorapub, widely_related, myown, tag_semantics, dagstuhl}, abstract = {The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin %B = Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Social Web Communities %D = 2008 %T = Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems %U = http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/benz2008analyzing.pdf

The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance.

@inproceedings{benz2008analyzing, author = {Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin}, title = {Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems}, editor = {Alani, Harith and Staab, Steffen and Stumme, Gerd}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Social Web Communities}, year = {2008}, number = {08391}, url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/benz2008analyzing.pdf}, keywords = {2008, ol_web2.0, itegpub, iin2009, tagorapub, widely_related, myown, tag_semantics, dagstuhl}, abstract = {The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin %B = Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Social Web Communities %D = 2008 %T = Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems %U = http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/benz2008analyzing.pdf

The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance.

@inproceedings{benz2008analyzing, author = {Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin}, title = {Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems}, editor = {Alani, Harith and Staab, Steffen and Stumme, Gerd}, booktitle = {Social Web Communities}, series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, year = {2008}, number = {08391}, url = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2008/1785}, keywords = {2008, tagging, taggingsurvey, collaborative, semantic, myown, dagstuhl, web}, abstract = {The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance. } }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin %B = Social Web Communities %C = Dagstuhl, Germany %D = 2008 %I = Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik %T = Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems %U = http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2008/1785

The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance.

@inproceedings{benz2008analyzing, author = {Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin}, title = {Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems}, editor = {Alani, Harith and Staab, Steffen and Stumme, Gerd}, booktitle = {Social Web Communities}, series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, year = {2008}, number = {08391}, url = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2008/1785}, keywords = {2008, tagging, collaborative, semantic, social, myown, dagstuhl, web}, abstract = {The objective of our group was to exploit state-of-the-art Information Retrieval methods for finding associations and dependencies between tags, capturing and representing differences in tagging behavior and vocabulary of various folksonomies, with the overall aim to better understand the semantics of tags and the tagging process. Therefore we analyze the semantic content of tags in the Flickr and Delicious folksonomies. We find that: tag context similarity leads to meaningful results in Flickr, despite its narrow folksonomy character; the comparison of tags across Flickr and Delicious shows little semantic overlap, being tags in Flickr associated more to visual aspects rather than technological as it seems to be in Delicious; there are regions in the tag-tag space, provided with the cosine similarity metric, that are characterized by high density; the order of tags inside a post has a semantic relevance. } }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Benz, Dominik and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Mladenic, Dunja and Servedio, Vito D. P. and Sizov, Sergej and Szomszor, Martin %B = Social Web Communities %C = Dagstuhl, Germany %D = 2008 %I = Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik %T = Analyzing Tag Semantics Across Collaborative Tagging Systems %U = http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2008/1785

@book{Semantic2006Ackermann, author = {Ackermann, Markus and Berendt, Bettina and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and Semeraro, Giovanni and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd and Svatek, Vojtech and van Someren, Maarten}, title = {Semantics, Web and Mining}, year = {2006}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11908678}, keywords = {2006, semantic, myown, mining, web} }

%0 = book %A = Ackermann, Markus and Berendt, Bettina and Grobelnik, Marko and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and Semeraro, Giovanni and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd and Svatek, Vojtech and van Someren, Maarten %D = 2006 %T = Semantics, Web and Mining %U = http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11908678

In this paper we present a new version of OntoGen system for semi-automatic data-driven ontology construction. The system is based on a novel ontology learning framework which formalizes and extends the role of machine learning and text mining algorithms used in the previous version. List of new features includes extended number of supported ontology formats (RDFS and OWL), supervised methods for concept discovery (based on Active Learning), adding of new instances to ontology and improved user interface (based on comments from the users).

@article{blaz06ontogen, author = {Fortuna, Blaz and Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja}, title = {Semi-automatic data-driven ontology construction system}, year = {2006}, keywords = {text, ol}, abstract = {In this paper we present a new version of OntoGen system for semi-automatic data-driven ontology construction. The system is based on a novel ontology learning framework which formalizes and extends the role of machine learning and text mining algorithms used in the previous version. List of new features includes extended number of supported ontology formats (RDFS and OWL), supervised methods for concept discovery (based on Active Learning), adding of new instances to ontology and improved user interface (based on comments from the users).} }

%0 = article %A = Fortuna, Blaz and Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja %D = 2006 %T = Semi-automatic data-driven ontology construction system

Summary 10.1002/047003033X.ch2.abs This chapter contains sections titled: * Introduction * Knowledge Discovery * Ontology Definition * Methodology for Semi-automatic Ontology Construction * Ontology Learning Scenarios * Using Knowledge Discovery for Ontology Learning * Related Work on Ontology Construction * Discussion and Conclusion * Acknowledgments * References

@inbook{grobelnik2006knowledge, author = {Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja}, title = {Knowledge Discovery for Ontology Construction}, booktitle = {Semantic Web Technologies}, publisher = {John Wiley & Sons, Ltd}, year = {2006}, pages = {9--27}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047003033X.ch2}, doi = {10.1002/047003033X.ch2}, isbn = {9780470030332}, keywords = {ol_web2.0, ontology_learning, knowledge_discovery}, abstract = {Summary 10.1002/047003033X.ch2.abs This chapter contains sections titled: * Introduction * Knowledge Discovery * Ontology Definition * Methodology for Semi-automatic Ontology Construction * Ontology Learning Scenarios * Using Knowledge Discovery for Ontology Learning * Related Work on Ontology Construction * Discussion and Conclusion * Acknowledgments * References} }

%0 = inbook %A = Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja %B = Semantic Web Technologies} %C = %D = 2006 %I = John Wiley & Sons, Ltd %T = Knowledge Discovery for Ontology Construction} %U = http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047003033X.ch2

We present experimental results of confronting the k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with Support Vector Machine (SVM) in
e collaborative filtering framework using datasets with different properties. While k-Nearest Neighbor is usually used forthe collaborative filtering tasks, Support Vector Machine is considered a state-of-the-art classification algorithm. Sincecollaborative filtering can also be interpreted as a classification/regression task, virtually any supervised learning algorithm(such as SVM) can also be applied. Experiments were performed on two standard, publicly available datasets and, on the otherhand, on a real-life corporate dataset that does not fit the profile of ideal data for collaborative filtering. We concludethat the quality of collaborative filtering recommendations is highly dependent on the quality of the data. Furthermore, wecan see that kNN is dominant over SVM on the two standard datasets. On the real-life corporate dataset with high level ofsparsity, kNN fails as it is unable to form reliable neighborhoods. In this case SVM outperforms kNN.

@article{keyhere, author = {Grčar, Miha and Fortuna, Blaž and Mladenič, Dunja and Grobelnik, Marko}, title = {kNN Versus SVM in the Collaborative Filtering Framework}, journal = {Data Science and Classification}, year = {2006}, pages = {251--260}, url = {http://db.cs.ualberta.ca/webkdd05/proc/paper25-mladenic.pdf}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34416-0_27}, keywords = {knn, svm, recommender, learning}, abstract = {We present experimental results of confronting the k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with Support Vector Machine (SVM) in the collaborative filtering framework using datasets with different properties. While k-Nearest Neighbor is usually used forthe collaborative filtering tasks, Support Vector Machine is considered a state-of-the-art classification algorithm. Sincecollaborative filtering can also be interpreted as a classification/regression task, virtually any supervised learning algorithm(such as SVM) can also be applied. Experiments were performed on two standard, publicly available datasets and, on the otherhand, on a real-life corporate dataset that does not fit the profile of ideal data for collaborative filtering. We concludethat the quality of collaborative filtering recommendations is highly dependent on the quality of the data. Furthermore, wecan see that kNN is dominant over SVM on the two standard datasets. On the real-life corporate dataset with high level ofsparsity, kNN fails as it is unable to form reliable neighborhoods. In this case SVM outperforms kNN.} }

%0 = article %A = Grčar, Miha and Fortuna, Blaž and Mladenič, Dunja and Grobelnik, Marko %D = 2006 %T = kNN Versus SVM in the Collaborative Filtering Framework %U = http://db.cs.ualberta.ca/webkdd05/proc/paper25-mladenic.pdf

An ontology is an explicit formal conceptualization of some domain of interest. Ontologies are increasingly used in various fields such as knowledge management, information extraction, and the semantic web. Ontology evaluation is the problem of assessing a given ontology from the point of view of a particular criterion of application, typically in order to determine which of several ontologies would best suit a particular purpose. This paper presents a survey of the state of the art in ontology evaluation.

@inproceedings{brank2005survey, author = {Brank, Janez and Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja}, title = {A Survey of Ontology Evaluation Techniques}, booktitle = {Proc. of 8th Int. multi-conf. Information Society}, year = {2005}, pages = {166--169}, keywords = {ol_web2.0, widely_related, ontology_learning, evaluation}, abstract = {An ontology is an explicit formal conceptualization of some domain of interest. Ontologies are increasingly used in various fields such as knowledge management, information extraction, and the semantic web. Ontology evaluation is the problem of assessing a given ontology from the point of view of a particular criterion of application, typically in order to determine which of several ontologies would best suit a particular purpose. This paper presents a survey of the state of the art in ontology evaluation.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Brank, Janez and Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja %B = Proc. of 8th Int. multi-conf. Information Society %D = 2005 %T = A Survey of Ontology Evaluation Techniques

@inproceedings{brank2005, author = {Brank, Janez and Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja}, title = {A Survey of Ontology Evaluation Techniques}, booktitle = {Proc. of 8th Int. multi-conf. Information Society}, year = {2005}, pages = {166--169}, keywords = {ol, survey, evaluation, ontology} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Brank, Janez and Grobelnik, Marko and Mladenić, Dunja %B = Proc. of 8th Int. multi-conf. Information Society %D = 2005 %T = A Survey of Ontology Evaluation Techniques

The purpose of Web mining is to develop methods and systems for discovering models of objects and processes on the World Wide Web and for web-based systems that show adaptive performance. Web Mining integrates three parent areas: Data Mining (we use this term here also for the closely related areas of Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery), Internet technology and World Wide Web, and for the more recent Semantic Web. The World Wide Web has made an enormous amount of information electronically accessible. The use of email, news and markup languages like HTML allow users to publish and read documents at a world-wide scale and to communicate via chat connections, including information in the form of images and voice records. The HTTP protocol that enables access to documents over the network via Web browsers created an immense improvement in communication and access to information. For some years these possibilities were used mostly in the scientific world but recent years have seen an immense growth in popularity, supported by the wide availability of computers and broadband communication. The use of the internet for other tasks than finding information and direct communication is increasing, as can be seen from the interest in ldquoe-activitiesrdquo such as e-commerce, e-learning, e-government, e-science.

@inproceedings{berendt2004roadmap, author = {Berendt, Bettina and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and van Someren, Maarten and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {A Roadmap for Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web.}, editor = {Berendt, Bettina and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and van Someren, Maarten and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd}, booktitle = {Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, year = {2004}, volume = {3209}, pages = {1-22}, url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2004/berendt2004roadmap.pdf}, keywords = {pkdd, workshop, itegpub, 2004, proceedings, semantic, l3s, ecml, myown, roadmap, ewmf, mining, web}, abstract = {The purpose of Web mining is to develop methods and systems for discovering models of objects and processes on the World Wide Web and for web-based systems that show adaptive performance. Web Mining integrates three parent areas: Data Mining (we use this term here also for the closely related areas of Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery), Internet technology and World Wide Web, and for the more recent Semantic Web. The World Wide Web has made an enormous amount of information electronically accessible. The use of email, news and markup languages like HTML allow users to publish and read documents at a world-wide scale and to communicate via chat connections, including information in the form of images and voice records. The HTTP protocol that enables access to documents over the network via Web browsers created an immense improvement in communication and access to information. For some years these possibilities were used mostly in the scientific world but recent years have seen an immense growth in popularity, supported by the wide availability of computers and broadband communication. The use of the internet for other tasks than finding information and direct communication is increasing, as can be seen from the interest in ldquoe-activitiesrdquo such as e-commerce, e-learning, e-government, e-science.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Berendt, Bettina and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and van Someren, Maarten and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd %B = Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web %C = Heidelberg %D = 2004 %I = Springer %T = A Roadmap for Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web. %U = http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2004/berendt2004roadmap.pdf

The purpose of Web mining is to develop methods and systems for discovering models of objects and processes on the World Wide Web and for web-based systems that show adaptive performance. Web Mining integrates three parent areas: Data Mining (we use this term here also for the closely related areas of Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery), Internet technology and World Wide Web, and for the more recent Semantic Web. The World Wide Web has made an enormous amount of information electronically accessible. The use of email, news and markup languages like HTML allow users to publish and read documents at a world-wide scale and to communicate via chat connections, including information in the form of images and voice records. The HTTP protocol that enables access to documents over the network via Web browsers created an immense improvement in communication and access to information. For some years these possibilities were used mostly in the scientific world but recent years have seen an immense growth in popularity, supported by the wide availability of computers and broadband communication. The use of the internet for other tasks than finding information and direct communication is increasing, as can be seen from the interest in ldquoe-activitiesrdquo such as e-commerce, e-learning, e-government, e-science.

@inproceedings{berendt2004roadmap, author = {Berendt, Bettina and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and van Someren, Maarten and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {A Roadmap for Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web.}, editor = {Berendt, Bettina and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and van Someren, Maarten and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd}, booktitle = {Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, year = {2004}, volume = {3209}, pages = {1-22}, url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2004/berendt2004roadmap.pdf}, keywords = {pkdd, workshop, itegpub, 2004, proceedings, semantic, l3s, ecml, myown, roadmap, ewmf, mining, web}, abstract = {The purpose of Web mining is to develop methods and systems for discovering models of objects and processes on the World Wide Web and for web-based systems that show adaptive performance. Web Mining integrates three parent areas: Data Mining (we use this term here also for the closely related areas of Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery), Internet technology and World Wide Web, and for the more recent Semantic Web. The World Wide Web has made an enormous amount of information electronically accessible. The use of email, news and markup languages like HTML allow users to publish and read documents at a world-wide scale and to communicate via chat connections, including information in the form of images and voice records. The HTTP protocol that enables access to documents over the network via Web browsers created an immense improvement in communication and access to information. For some years these possibilities were used mostly in the scientific world but recent years have seen an immense growth in popularity, supported by the wide availability of computers and broadband communication. The use of the internet for other tasks than finding information and direct communication is increasing, as can be seen from the interest in ldquoe-activitiesrdquo such as e-commerce, e-learning, e-government, e-science.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Berendt, Bettina and Hotho, Andreas and Mladenic, Dunja and van Someren, Maarten and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Stumme, Gerd %B = Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web %C = Heidelberg %D = 2004 %I = Springer %T = A Roadmap for Web Mining: From Web to Semantic Web. %U = http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2004/berendt2004roadmap.pdf

@inproceedings{mladenic98turning, author = {Mladenic, Dunja}, title = {Turning Yahoo to Automatic Web-Page Classifier}, booktitle = {European Conference on Artificial Intelligence}, year = {1998}, pages = {473--474}, url = {citeseer.nj.nec.com/mladenic98turning.html}, keywords = {automatic, yahoo, classification, page, turning, web} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Mladenic, Dunja %B = European Conference on Artificial Intelligence %D = 1998 %T = Turning Yahoo to Automatic Web-Page Classifier %U = citeseer.nj.nec.com/mladenic98turning.html