TY - CONF AU - Hoser, Bettina AU - Hotho, Andreas AU - Jäschke, Robert AU - Schmitz, Christoph AU - Stumme, Gerd A2 - Sure, York A2 - Domingue, John T1 - Semantic Network Analysis of Ontologies T2 - The Semantic Web: Research and Applications PB - Springer C1 - Heidelberg PY - 2006/06 CY - VL - 4011 IS - SP - 514 EP - 529 UR - http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2006/hoser2006semantic.pdf DO - KW - 2006 KW - l3s KW - myown KW - nepomuk KW - ontology KW - semantic KW - sna KW - socialnetworkanalysis KW - sota KW - web L1 - SN - N1 - N1 - AB - A key argument for modeling knowledge in ontologies is the easy

re-use and re-engineering of the knowledge. However, beside

consistency checking, current ontology engineering tools provide

only basic functionalities for analyzing ontologies. Since

ontologies can be considered as (labeled, directed) graphs, graph

analysis techniques are a suitable answer for this need. Graph

analysis has been performed by sociologists for over 60 years, and

resulted in the vivid research area of Social Network Analysis

(SNA). While social network structures in general currently receive

high attention in the Semantic Web community, there are only very

few SNA applications up to now, and virtually none for analyzing the

structure of ontologies.

We illustrate in this paper the benefits of applying SNA to

ontologies and the Semantic Web, and discuss which research topics

arise on the edge between the two areas. In particular, we discuss

how different notions of centrality describe the core content and

structure of an ontology. From the rather simple notion of degree

centrality over betweenness centrality to the more complex

eigenvector centrality based on Hermitian matrices, we illustrate

the insights these measures provide on two ontologies, which are

different in purpose, scope, and size. ER - TY - JOUR AU - Stumme, Gerd AU - Hotho, Andreas AU - Berendt, Bettina T1 - Semantic Web Mining - State of the Art and Future Directions JO - Journal of Web Semantics PY - 2006/ VL - 4 IS - 2 SP - 124 EP - 143 UR - http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2006/stumme2006semantic.pdf DO - KW - 2006 KW - l3s KW - mining KW - myown KW - semantic KW - sota KW - survey KW - web L1 - SN - N1 - N1 - AB - SemanticWeb Mining aims at combining the two fast-developing research areas SemanticWeb andWeb Mining.

This survey analyzes the convergence of trends from both areas: an increasing number of researchers is working on

improving the results ofWeb Mining by exploiting semantic structures in theWeb, and they make use ofWeb Mining

techniques for building the Semantic Web. Last but not least, these techniques can be used for mining the Semantic

Web itself.

The Semantic Web is the second-generation WWW, enriched by machine-processable information which supports

the user in his tasks. Given the enormous size even of today’s Web, it is impossible to manually enrich all of

these resources. Therefore, automated schemes for learning the relevant information are increasingly being used.

Web Mining aims at discovering insights about the meaning of Web resources and their usage. Given the primarily

syntactical nature of the data being mined, the discovery of meaning is impossible based on these data only. Therefore,

formalizations of the semantics of Web sites and navigation behavior are becoming more and more common.

Furthermore, mining the Semantic Web itself is another upcoming application. We argue that the two areas Web

Mining and Semantic Web need each other to fulfill their goals, but that the full potential of this convergence is not

yet realized. This paper gives an overview of where the two areas meet today, and sketches ways of how a closer

integration could be profitable. ER -