Hotho, A.; Benz, D.; Eisterlehner, F.; Jäschke, R.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G.: Publikationsmanagement mit BibSonomy - ein Social-Bookmarking-System für Wissenschaftler. In:
HMD -- Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik Heft 271 (2010), S. 47-58
[Kurzfassung]
[BibTeX]
Kooperative Verschlagwortungs- bzw. Social-Bookmarking-Systeme wie Delicious, Mister Wong oder auch unser eigenes System BibSonomy erfreuen sich immer größerer Beliebtheit und bilden einen zentralen Bestandteil des heutigen Web 2.0. In solchen Systemen erstellen Nutzer leichtgewichtige Begriffssysteme, sogenannte Folksonomies, die die Nutzerdaten strukturieren. Die einfache Bedienbarkeit, die Allgegenwärtigkeit, die ständige Verfügbarkeit, aber auch die Möglichkeit, Gleichgesinnte spontan in solchen Systemen zu entdecken oder sie schlicht als Informationsquelle zu nutzen, sind Gründe für ihren gegenwärtigen Erfolg. Der Artikel führt den Begriff Social Bookmarking ein und diskutiert zentrale Elemente (wie Browsing und Suche) am Beispiel von BibSonomy anhand typischer Arbeitsabläufe eines Wissenschaftlers. Wir beschreiben die Architektur von BibSonomy sowie Wege der Integration und Vernetzung von BibSonomy mit Content-Management-Systemen und Webauftritten. Der Artikel schließt mit Querbezügen zu aktuellen Forschungsfragen im Bereich Social Bookmarking.
Jäschke, R.; Marinho, L.; Hotho, A.; Schmidt-Thieme, L. & Stumme, G.: Tag Recommendations in Social Bookmarking Systems. In:
AI Communications 21 (2008), Nr. 4, S. 231-247
[Volltext]
[Kurzfassung]
[BibTeX]
Collaborative tagging systems allow users to assign keywords - so called "tags" - to resources. Tags are used for navigation, finding resources and serendipitous browsing and thus provide an immediate benefit for users. These systems usually include tag recommendation mechanisms easing the process of finding good tags for a resource, but also consolidating the tag vocabulary across users. In practice, however, only very basic recommendation strategies are applied.
In this paper we evaluate and compare several recommendation algorithms on large-scale real life datasets: an adaptation of
user-based collaborative filtering, a graph-based recommender built on top of the FolkRank algorithm, and simple methods based on counting tag occurences. We show that both FolkRank and Collaborative Filtering provide better results than non-personalized baseline methods. Moreover, since methods based on counting tag occurrences are computationally cheap, and thus usually preferable for real time scenarios, we discuss simple approaches for improving the performance of such methods. We show, how a simple recommender based on counting tags from users and resources can perform almost as good as the best recommender.
Krause, B.; Jäschke, R.; Hotho, A. & Stumme, G.: Logsonomy - Social Information Retrieval with Logdata.
HT '08: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008, S. 157-166
[Volltext] [Kurzfassung]
[BibTeX]
Social bookmarking systems constitute an established
part of the Web 2.0. In such systems
users describe bookmarks by keywords
called tags. The structure behind these social
systems, called folksonomies, can be viewed
as a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource
nodes. This underlying network shows
specific structural properties that explain its
growth and the possibility of serendipitous
exploration.
Today’s search engines represent the gateway
to retrieve information from the World Wide
Web. Short queries typically consisting of
two to three words describe a user’s information
need. In response to the displayed
results of the search engine, users click on
the links of the result page as they expect
the answer to be of relevance.
This clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy
in which queries are descriptions of
clicked URLs. The resulting network structure,
which we will term logsonomy is very
similar to the one of folksonomies. In order
to find out about its properties, we analyze
the topological characteristics of the tripartite
hypergraph of queries, users and bookmarks
on a large snapshot of del.icio.us and
on query logs of two large search engines.
All of the three datasets show small world
properties. The tagging behavior of users,
which is explained by preferential attachment
of the tags in social bookmark systems, is
reflected in the distribution of single query
words in search engines. We can conclude
that the clicking behaviour of search engine
users based on the displayed search results
and the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking
users is driven by similar dynamics.
Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Hotho, A. & Stumme, G.: The Anti-Social Tagger - Detecting Spam in Social Bookmarking Systems.
Proc. of the Fourth International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web. 2008
[Volltext]
[BibTeX]