Social Tagging Systems are web applications in which users upload resources (e.g., bookmarks, videos, photos, etc.) and annotate it with a list of freely chosen keywords called tags. This is a grassroots approach to organize a site and help users to find the resources they are interested in. Social tagging systems are open and inherently social; features that have been proven to encourage participation. However, with the large popularity of these systems and the increasing amount of user-contributed content, information overload rapidly becomes an issue. Recommender Systems are well known applications for increasing the level of relevant content over the “noise” that continuously grows as more and more content becomes available online. In social tagging systems, however, we face new challenges. While in classic recommender systems the mode of recommendation is basically the resource, in social tagging systems there are three possible modes of recommendation: users, resources, or tags. Therefore suitable methods that properly exploit the different dimensions of social tagging systems data are needed. In this book, we survey the most recent and state-of-the-art work about a whole new generation of recommender systems built to serve social tagging systems. The book is divided into self-contained chapters covering the background material on social tagging systems and recommender systems to the more advanced techniques like the ones based on tensor factorization and graph-based models.

@book{balbymarinho2012recommender, author = {Balby Marinho, L. and Hotho, A. and Jäschke, R. and Nanopoulos, A. and Rendle, S. and Schmidt-Thieme, L. and Stumme, G. and Symeonidis, P.}, title = {Recommender Systems for Social Tagging Systems}, series = {SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering}, publisher = {Springer}, year = {2012}, url = {http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-1894-8}, doi = {10.1007/978-1-4614-1894-8}, isbn = {978-1-4614-1893-1}, keywords = {2012, bookmarking, collaborative, folksonomy, info20, itegpub, l3s, myown, recommender, social, tagging, tagging,2012}, abstract = {Social Tagging Systems are web applications in which users upload resources (e.g., bookmarks, videos, photos, etc.) and annotate it with a list of freely chosen keywords called tags. This is a grassroots approach to organize a site and help users to find the resources they are interested in. Social tagging systems are open and inherently social; features that have been proven to encourage participation. However, with the large popularity of these systems and the increasing amount of user-contributed content, information overload rapidly becomes an issue. Recommender Systems are well known applications for increasing the level of relevant content over the “noise” that continuously grows as more and more content becomes available online. In social tagging systems, however, we face new challenges. While in classic recommender systems the mode of recommendation is basically the resource, in social tagging systems there are three possible modes of recommendation: users, resources, or tags. Therefore suitable methods that properly exploit the different dimensions of social tagging systems data are needed. In this book, we survey the most recent and state-of-the-art work about a whole new generation of recommender systems built to serve social tagging systems. The book is divided into self-contained chapters covering the background material on social tagging systems and recommender systems to the more advanced techniques like the ones based on tensor factorization and graph-based models.} }

%0 = book %A = Balby Marinho, L. and Hotho, A. and Jäschke, R. and Nanopoulos, A. and Rendle, S. and Schmidt-Thieme, L. and Stumme, G. and Symeonidis, P. %D = 2012 %I = Springer %T = Recommender Systems for Social Tagging Systems %U = http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-1894-8

Originally introduced by social bookmarking systems, collaborative tagging, or social tagging, has been widely adopted by many web-based systems like wikis, e-commerce platforms, or social networks. Collaborative tagging systems allow users to annotate resources using freely chosen keywords, so called tags . Those tags help users in finding/retrieving resources, discovering new resources, and navigating through the system. The process of tagging resources is laborious. Therefore, most systems support their users by tag recommender components that recommend tags in a personalized way. The Discovery Challenges 2008 and 2009 of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD) tackled the problem of tag recommendations in collaborative tagging systems. Researchers were invited to test their methods in a competition on datasets from the social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy. Moreover, the 2009 challenge included an online task where the recommender systems were integrated into BibSonomy and provided recommendations in real time. In this chapter we review, evaluate and summarize the submissions to the two Discovery Challenges and thus lay the groundwork for continuing research in this area.

@incollection{jaeschke2012challenges, author = {Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Mitzlaff, Folke and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {Challenges in Tag Recommendations for Collaborative Tagging Systems}, editor = {Pazos Arias, José J. and Fernández Vilas, Ana and Díaz Redondo, Rebeca P.}, booktitle = {Recommender Systems for the Social Web}, series = {Intelligent Systems Reference Library}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin/Heidelberg}, year = {2012}, volume = {32}, pages = {65--87}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25694-3_3}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-25694-3_3}, isbn = {978-3-642-25694-3}, keywords = {2012, bookmarking, challenge, collaborative, dc09, discovery, folksonomy, info20, itegpub, l3s, myown, recommender, rsdc08, social, tagging}, abstract = {Originally introduced by social bookmarking systems, collaborative tagging, or social tagging, has been widely adopted by many web-based systems like wikis, e-commerce platforms, or social networks. Collaborative tagging systems allow users to annotate resources using freely chosen keywords, so called tags . Those tags help users in finding/retrieving resources, discovering new resources, and navigating through the system. The process of tagging resources is laborious. Therefore, most systems support their users by tag recommender components that recommend tags in a personalized way. The Discovery Challenges 2008 and 2009 of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD) tackled the problem of tag recommendations in collaborative tagging systems. Researchers were invited to test their methods in a competition on datasets from the social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy. Moreover, the 2009 challenge included an online task where the recommender systems were integrated into BibSonomy and provided recommendations in real time. In this chapter we review, evaluate and summarize the submissions to the two Discovery Challenges and thus lay the groundwork for continuing research in this area.} }

%0 = incollection %A = Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Mitzlaff, Folke and Stumme, Gerd %B = Recommender Systems for the Social Web %C = Berlin/Heidelberg %D = 2012 %I = Springer %T = Challenges in Tag Recommendations for Collaborative Tagging Systems %U = http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25694-3_3

Social bookmarking systems allow users to store links to internet resources on a web page. As social bookmarking systems are growing in popularity, search algorithms have been developed that transfer the idea of link-based rankings in the Web to a social bookmarking system’s
ta structure. These rankings differ from traditional search engine rankings in that they incorporate the rating of users.

n this study, we compare search in social bookmarking systems with traditionalWeb search. In the first part, we compare the user activity and behaviour in both kinds of systems, as well as the overlap of the underlying sets of URLs. In the second part,we compare graph-based and vector space rankings for social bookmarking systems with commercial search engine rankings.

ur experiments are performed on data of the social bookmarking system Del.icio.us and on rankings and log data from Google, MSN, and AOL. We will show that part of the difference between the systems is due to different behaviour (e. g., the concatenation of multi-word lexems
single terms in Del.icio.us), and that real-world events may trigger similar behaviour in both kinds of systems. We will also show that a graph-based ranking approach on folksonomies yields results that are closer to the rankings of the commercial search engines than vector space
trieval, and that the correlation is high in particular for the domains that are well covered by the social bookmarking system.

@inproceedings{krause2008comparison, author = {Krause, Beate and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {A Comparison of Social Bookmarking with Traditional Search}, editor = {Macdonald, Craig and Ounis, Iadh and Plachouras, Vassilis and Ruthven, Ian and White, Ryen W.}, booktitle = {Advances in Information Retrieval, 30th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2008}, series = {LNAI}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, year = {2008}, volume = {4956}, pages = {101-113}, keywords = {2008, bookmarking, comparison, folksonomies, folksonomy, itegpub, logsonomies, myown, search, social, tagorapub}, abstract = {Social bookmarking systems allow users to store links to internet resources on a web page. As social bookmarking systems are growing in popularity, search algorithms have been developed that transfer the idea of link-based rankings in the Web to a social bookmarking system’s
ta structure. These rankings differ from traditional search engine rankings in that they incorporate the rating of users.

n this study, we compare search in social bookmarking systems with traditionalWeb search. In the first part, we compare the user activity and behaviour in both kinds of systems, as well as the overlap of the underlying sets of URLs. In the second part,we compare graph-based and vector space rankings for social bookmarking systems with commercial search engine rankings.

ur experiments are performed on data of the social bookmarking system Del.icio.us and on rankings and log data from Google, MSN, and AOL. We will show that part of the difference between the systems is due to different behaviour (e. g., the concatenation of multi-word lexems
single terms in Del.icio.us), and that real-world events may trigger similar behaviour in both kinds of systems. We will also show that a graph-based ranking approach on folksonomies yields results that are closer to the rankings of the commercial search engines than vector space
trieval, and that the correlation is high in particular for the domains that are well covered by the social bookmarking system.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Krause, Beate and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd %B = Advances in Information Retrieval, 30th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2008 %C = Heidelberg %D = 2008 %I = Springer %T = A Comparison of Social Bookmarking with Traditional Search

Social bookmarking systems constitute an established
rt of the Web 2.0. In such systems
ers describe bookmarks by keywords
lled tags. The structure behind these social
stems, called folksonomies, can be viewed
a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource
des. This underlying network shows
ecific structural properties that explain its
owth and the possibility of serendipitous
ploration.
day’s search engines represent the gateway
retrieve information from the World Wide
b. Short queries typically consisting of
o to three words describe a user’s information
ed. In response to the displayed
sults of the search engine, users click on
e links of the result page as they expect
e answer to be of relevance.
is clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy
which queries are descriptions of
icked URLs. The resulting network structure,
ich we will term logsonomy is very
milar to the one of folksonomies. In order
find out about its properties, we analyze
e topological characteristics of the tripartite
pergraph of queries, users and bookmarks
a large snapshot of del.icio.us and
query logs of two large search engines.
l of the three datasets show small world
operties. The tagging behavior of users,
ich is explained by preferential attachment
the tags in social bookmark systems, is
flected in the distribution of single query
rds in search engines. We can conclude
at the clicking behaviour of search engine
ers based on the displayed search results
d the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking
ers is driven by similar dynamics.

@inproceedings{krause2008logsonomy, author = {Krause, Beate and Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {Logsonomy - Social Information Retrieval with Logdata}, booktitle = {HT '08: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, year = {2008}, pages = {157--166}, url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1379092.1379123&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&type=series&idx=SERIES399&part=series&WantType=Journals&title=Proceedings%20of%20the%20nineteenth%20ACM%20conference%20on%20Hypertext%20and%20hypermedia}, doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1379092.1379123}, isbn = {978-1-59593-985-2}, keywords = {2.0, 2008, analysis, folksonomy, information, itegpub, logsonomy, myown, network, retrieval, search, social, tagorapub, web, web2.0, web20}, abstract = {Social bookmarking systems constitute an established
rt of the Web 2.0. In such systems
ers describe bookmarks by keywords
lled tags. The structure behind these social
stems, called folksonomies, can be viewed
a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource
des. This underlying network shows
ecific structural properties that explain its
owth and the possibility of serendipitous
ploration.
day’s search engines represent the gateway
retrieve information from the World Wide
b. Short queries typically consisting of
o to three words describe a user’s information
ed. In response to the displayed
sults of the search engine, users click on
e links of the result page as they expect
e answer to be of relevance.
is clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy
which queries are descriptions of
icked URLs. The resulting network structure,
ich we will term logsonomy is very
milar to the one of folksonomies. In order
find out about its properties, we analyze
e topological characteristics of the tripartite
pergraph of queries, users and bookmarks
a large snapshot of del.icio.us and
query logs of two large search engines.
l of the three datasets show small world
operties. The tagging behavior of users,
ich is explained by preferential attachment
the tags in social bookmark systems, is
flected in the distribution of single query
rds in search engines. We can conclude
at the clicking behaviour of search engine
ers based on the displayed search results
d the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking
ers is driven by similar dynamics.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Krause, Beate and Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd %B = HT '08: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia %C = New York, NY, USA %D = 2008 %I = ACM %T = Logsonomy - Social Information Retrieval with Logdata %U = http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1379092.1379123&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&type=series&idx=SERIES399&part=series&WantType=Journals&title=Proceedings%20of%20the%20nineteenth%20ACM%20conference%20on%20Hypertext%20and%20hypermedia

@inproceedings{krause2008antisocial, author = {Krause, Beate and Schmitz, Christoph and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {The Anti-Social Tagger - Detecting Spam in Social Bookmarking Systems}, booktitle = {Proc. of the Fourth International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web}, year = {2008}, url = {http://airweb.cse.lehigh.edu/2008/submissions/krause_2008_anti_social_tagger.pdf}, keywords = {2.0, 2008, bookmarking, folksonomies, folksonomy, itegpub, myown, social, spam, systems, tagger, tagorapub, web, web2.0} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Krause, Beate and Schmitz, Christoph and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd %B = Proc. of the Fourth International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web %D = 2008 %T = The Anti-Social Tagger - Detecting Spam in Social Bookmarking Systems %U = http://airweb.cse.lehigh.edu/2008/submissions/krause_2008_anti_social_tagger.pdf

@inproceedings{grahl07conceptualKdml, author = {Grahl, Miranda and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {Conceptual Clustering of Social Bookmark Sites}, editor = {Hinneburg, Alexander}, booktitle = {Workshop Proceedings of Lernen -- Wissensentdeckung -- Adaptivität (LWA 2007)}, publisher = {Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg}, year = {2007}, pages = {50-54}, url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/hotho/pub/2007/kdml_recommender_final.pdf}, isbn = {978-3-86010-907-6}, keywords = {2007, Social, bookmark, bookmarking, clustering, collaborative, conceptual, folksonomies, folksonomy, itegpub, myown, social, tagging, tagorapub} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Grahl, Miranda and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd %B = Workshop Proceedings of Lernen -- Wissensentdeckung -- Adaptivität (LWA 2007) %D = 2007 %I = Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg %T = Conceptual Clustering of Social Bookmark Sites %U = http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/hotho/pub/2007/kdml_recommender_final.pdf

Currently, social bookmarking systems provide intuitive support for browsing locally their content. A global view is usually presented by the tag cloud of the
stem, but it does not allow a conceptual drill-down, e. g., along a conceptual hierarchy. In this paper, we present a clustering approach for computing such a conceptual hierarchy for a given folksonomy. The hierarchy is complemented with ranked lists of users and resources most related to each cluster. The rankings are computed using our FolkRank algorithm. We have evaluated our approach on large scale data from the del.icio.us bookmarking system.

@inproceedings{grahl2007clustering, author = {Grahl, Miranda and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {Conceptual Clustering of Social Bookmarking Sites}, booktitle = {7th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW '07)}, publisher = {Know-Center}, address = {Graz, Austria}, year = {2007}, pages = {356-364}, keywords = {2007, folksonomies, folksonomy, itegpub, myown, sites, social, tagging, tagorapub}, abstract = {Currently, social bookmarking systems provide intuitive support for browsing locally their content. A global view is usually presented by the tag cloud of the
stem, but it does not allow a conceptual drill-down, e. g., along a conceptual hierarchy. In this paper, we present a clustering approach for computing such a conceptual hierarchy for a given folksonomy. The hierarchy is complemented with ranked lists of users and resources most related to each cluster. The rankings are computed using our FolkRank algorithm. We have evaluated our approach on large scale data from the del.icio.us bookmarking system.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Grahl, Miranda and Hotho, Andreas and Stumme, Gerd %B = 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW '07) %C = Graz, Austria %D = 2007 %I = Know-Center %T = Conceptual Clustering of Social Bookmarking Sites

@inproceedings{jaeschke07tagKdml, author = {Jaeschke, Robert and Marinho, Leandro and Hotho, Andreas and Schmidt-Thieme, Lars and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {Tag Recommendations in Folksonomies}, editor = {Hinneburg, Alexander}, booktitle = {Workshop Proceedings of Lernen - Wissensentdeckung - Adaptivität (LWA 2007)}, publisher = {Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg}, year = {2007}, pages = {13-20}, url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2007/jaeschke07tagrecommendationsKDML.pdf}, isbn = {978-3-86010-907-6}, keywords = {2007, bookmarking, collaborative, filtering, folksonomy, itegpub, l3s, myown, recommender, social} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Jaeschke, Robert and Marinho, Leandro and Hotho, Andreas and Schmidt-Thieme, Lars and Stumme, Gerd %B = Workshop Proceedings of Lernen - Wissensentdeckung - Adaptivität (LWA 2007) %D = 2007 %I = Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg %T = Tag Recommendations in Folksonomies %U = http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2007/jaeschke07tagrecommendationsKDML.pdf

BibSonomy is a web-based social resource sharing system which allows users to organise and share bookmarks and publications in a collaborative manner. In this paper we present the system, followed by a description of the insights in the structure of its bibliographic data that we gained by applying techniques we developed in the area of Formal Concept Analysis.

@inproceedings{jaeschke2007analysis, author = {Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {Analysis of the Publication Sharing Behaviour in BibSonomy}, editor = {Priss, U. and Polovina, S. and Hill, R.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2007)}, series = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag}, address = {Berlin, Heidelberg}, year = {2007}, volume = {4604}, pages = {283--295}, isbn = {3-540-73680-8}, keywords = {2007, BibSonomy, bibsonomy, bookmarking, fca, folksonomy, iccs, itegpub, l3s, myown, publication, sharing, social, trias}, abstract = {BibSonomy is a web-based social resource sharing system which allows users to organise and share bookmarks and publications in a collaborative manner. In this paper we present the system, followed by a description of the insights in the structure of its bibliographic data that we gained by applying techniques we developed in the area of Formal Concept Analysis.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Jäschke, Robert and Hotho, Andreas and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd %B = Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2007) %C = Berlin, Heidelberg %D = 2007 %I = Springer-Verlag %T = Analysis of the Publication Sharing Behaviour in BibSonomy

Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such
stems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures
lled folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the
ct that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this
per we specify a formal model for folksonomies and briefly describe
r own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both bookmarks
d publication references in a kind of personal library.

@inproceedings{hotho2006bibsonomy, author = {Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd}, title = {BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System}, editor = {de Moor, Aldo and Polovina, Simon and Delugach, Harry}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the First Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures}, publisher = {Aalborg Universitetsforlag}, address = {Aalborg}, year = {2006}, pages = {87-102}, url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2006/hotho2006bibsonomy.pdf}, isbn = {87-7307-769-0}, keywords = {2006, FCA, OntologyHandbook, bibsonomy, bookmarking, folksonomy, iccs, l3s, myown, nepomuk, social, tagorapub}, abstract = {Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such
stems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures
lled folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the
ct that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this
per we specify a formal model for folksonomies and briefly describe
r own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both bookmarks
d publication references in a kind of personal library.} }

%0 = inproceedings %A = Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd %B = Proceedings of the First Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures %C = Aalborg %D = 2006 %I = Aalborg Universitetsforlag %T = BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System %U = http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/stumme/papers/2006/hotho2006bibsonomy.pdf