Ackermann, M.; Berendt, B.; Grobelnik, M.; Hotho, A.; Mladenic, D.; Semeraro, G.; Spiliopoulou, M.; Stumme, G.; Svatek, V. & van Someren, M., ed. (2006), Semantics, Web and Mining , Springer , Heidelberg .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

Alani, H.; Hoser, B.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G., ed. (2006), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Semantic Network Analysis .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

Hoser, B.; Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G. (2006), Semantic Network Analysis of Ontologies, in York Sure & John Domingue, ed., 'The Semantic Web: Research and Applications' , Springer, Heidelberg , pp. 514-529 .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

A key argument for modeling knowledge in ontologies is the easy re-use and re-engineering of the knowledge. However, beside consistency checking, current ontology engineering tools provide only basic functionalities for analyzing ontologies. Since ontologies can be considered as (labeled, directed) graphs, graph analysis techniques are a suitable answer for this need. Graph analysis has been performed by sociologists for over 60 years, and resulted in the vivid research area of Social Network Analysis (SNA). While social network structures in general currently receive high attention in the Semantic Web community, there are only very few SNA applications up to now, and virtually none for analyzing the structure of ontologies. We illustrate in this paper the benefits of applying SNA to ontologies and the Semantic Web, and discuss which research topics arise on the edge between the two areas. In particular, we discuss how different notions of centrality describe the core content and structure of an ontology. From the rather simple notion of degree centrality over betweenness centrality to the more complex eigenvector centrality based on Hermitian matrices, we illustrate the insights these measures provide on two ontologies, which are different in purpose, scope, and size.

Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G. (2006), BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System, in Aldo de Moor; Simon Polovina & Harry Delugach, ed., 'Proceedings of the First Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures' , Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Aalborg , pp. 87-102 .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this paper we specify a formal model for folksonomies and briefly describe our own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both bookmarks and publication references in a kind of personal library.

Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G. (2006), Emergent Semantics in BibSonomy, in Christian Hochberger & Rüdiger Liskowsky, ed., 'Informatik 2006 -- Informatik für Menschen. Band 2' , Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this paper we specify a formal model for folksonomies, briefly describe our own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both bookmarks and publication references, and discuss first steps towards emergent semantics.

Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G. (2006), FolkRank: A Ranking Algorithm for Folksonomies, in 'Proc. FGIR 2006' .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

In social bookmark tools users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. Currently, the information retrieval support is limited. We present a formal model and a new search algorithm for folksonomies, called FolkRank, that exploits the structure of the folksonomy. The proposed algorithm is also applied to find communities within the folksonomy and is used to structure search results. All findings are demonstrated on a large scale dataset. A long version of this paper has been published at the European Semantic Web Conference 2006.

Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G. (2006), Trend Detection in Folksonomies, in Yannis S. Avrithis; Yiannis Kompatsiaris; Steffen Staab & Noel E. O'Connor, ed., 'Proc. First International Conference on Semantics And Digital Media Technology (SAMT) ' , Springer, Heidelberg , pp. 56-70 .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

As the number of resources on the web exceeds by far the number of documents one can track, it becomes increasingly difficult to remain up to date on ones own areas of interest. The problem becomes more severe with the increasing fraction of multimedia data, from which it is difficult to extract some conceptual description of their contents. One way to overcome this problem are social bookmark tools, which are rapidly emerging on the web. In such systems, users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies, and overcome thus the knowledge acquisition bottleneck. As more and more people participate in the effort, the use of a common vocabulary becomes more and more stable. We present an approach for discovering topic-specific trends within folksonomies. It is based on a differential adaptation of the PageRank algorithm to the triadic hypergraph structure of a folksonomy. The approach allows for any kind of data, as it does not rely on the internal structure of the documents. In particular, this allows to consider different data types in the same analysis step. We run experiments on a large-scale real-world snapshot of a social bookmarking system.

Jäschke, R.; Hotho, A.; Schmitz, C. & Stumme, G. (2006), Wege zur Entdeckung von Communities in Folksonomies, in Stefan Braß & Alexander Hinneburg, ed., 'Proc. 18. Workshop Grundlagen von Datenbanken' , Martin-Luther-Universität , Halle-Wittenberg , pp. 80-84 .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

Ein wichtiger Baustein des neu entdeckten World Wide Web -- des "`Web 2.0"' -- stellen Folksonomies dar. In diesen Systemen können Benutzer gemeinsam Ressourcen verwalten und mit Schlagwörtern versehen. Die dadurch entstehenden begrifflichen Strukturen stellen ein interessantes Forschungsfeld dar. Dieser Artikel untersucht Ansätze und Wege zur Entdeckung und Strukturierung von Nutzergruppen ("Communities") in Folksonomies.

Schmitz, C.; Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R. & Stumme, G. (2006), Mining Association Rules in Folksonomies, in V. Batagelj; H.-H. Bock; A. Ferligoj & A. Žiberna, ed., 'Data Science and Classification. Proceedings of the 10th IFCS Conf.' , Springer, Heidelberg , pp. 261--270 .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. These systems provide currently relatively few structure. We discuss in this paper, how association rule mining can be adopted to analyze and structure folksonomies, and how the results can be used for ontology learning and supporting emergent semantics. We demonstrate our approach on a large scale dataset stemming from an online system.

Stumme, G.; Hotho, A. & Berendt, B. (2006), 'Semantic Web Mining - State of the Art and Future Directions', Journal of Web Semantics 4 (2) , 124-143 .
[BibTeX] [Endnote]

SemanticWeb Mining aims at combining the two fast-developing research areas SemanticWeb andWeb Mining. This survey analyzes the convergence of trends from both areas: an increasing number of researchers is working on improving the results ofWeb Mining by exploiting semantic structures in theWeb, and they make use ofWeb Mining techniques for building the Semantic Web. Last but not least, these techniques can be used for mining the Semantic Web itself. The Semantic Web is the second-generation WWW, enriched by machine-processable information which supports the user in his tasks. Given the enormous size even of today’s Web, it is impossible to manually enrich all of these resources. Therefore, automated schemes for learning the relevant information are increasingly being used. Web Mining aims at discovering insights about the meaning of Web resources and their usage. Given the primarily syntactical nature of the data being mined, the discovery of meaning is impossible based on these data only. Therefore, formalizations of the semantics of Web sites and navigation behavior are becoming more and more common. Furthermore, mining the Semantic Web itself is another upcoming application. We argue that the two areas Web Mining and Semantic Web need each other to fulfill their goals, but that the full potential of this convergence is not yet realized. This paper gives an overview of where the two areas meet today, and sketches ways of how a closer integration could be profitable.