%0 
%0 Conference Proceedings
%A Anagnostopoulos, Aris; Brova, George & Terzi, Evimaria
%D 2011
%T Peer and Authority Pressure in Information-Propagation Models
%E 
%B Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD 2011
%C 
%I 
%V 
%6
%N 
%P 
%& 
%Y 
%S 
%7
%8 
%9
%? 
%! 
%Z 
%@ 
%(
%)
%*
%L
%M
%1 
%2 
%3 inproceedings
%4 
%# 
%$ 
%F anagnostopoulos2011authority
%K analysis, authority, bibsonomy, network, peer, toread
%X 
%Z 
%U 
%+
%^

%0 
%0 Conference Proceedings
%A Camussone, P.; Cuel, R. & Ponte, D.
%D 2010
%T ICT and Innovative Review Models: Implications For The Scientific Publishing Industry
%E 
%B Proceedings of: WOA 2010, Bologna, 16-18 giugno 2010
%C 
%I 
%V 
%6
%N 
%P 1--14
%& 
%Y 
%S 
%7
%8 
%9
%? 
%! 
%Z 
%@ 
%(
%)
%*
%L
%M
%1 
%2 CiteULike: ICT and Innovative Review Models: Implications For The Scientific Publishing Industry
%3 inproceedings
%4 
%# 
%$ 
%F camussone2010innovative
%K ict, info20, liquid, peer, publication, review
%X 
%Z 
%U 
%+
%^

%0 
%0 Conference Proceedings
%A Taraborelli, Dario
%D 2008
%T Soft peer review: Social software and distributed scientific evaluation
%E 
%B Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP ’08)
%C 
%I 
%V 
%6
%N 
%P 
%& 
%Y 
%S 
%7
%8 
%9
%? 
%! 
%Z 
%@ 
%(
%)
%*
%L
%M
%1 
%2 
%3 inproceedings
%4 
%# 
%$ 
%F taraborelli2008review
%K eval, evaluation, info, info20, peer, peer_review, project, review, social
%X 
%Z 
%U http://nitens.org/docs/spr_coop08.pdf
%+
%^

%0 
%0 Thesis
%A Sandberg, Oskar
%D 2005
%T Searching in a small world
%E 
%B 
%C 
%I Center for Mathematical Sciences, Göteborg University
%V 
%6
%N 
%P 
%& 
%Y 
%S 
%7
%8 
%9 licentiate thesis
%? 
%! 
%Z 
%@ 
%(
%)
%*
%L
%M
%1 
%2 related to FreeNet: http://freenet.sourceforge.net/
%3 mastersthesis
%4 
%# 
%$ 
%F sandberg2005searching
%K search, peer, searching, world, p2p, small
%X 
%Z 
%U http://www.math.chalmers.se/~ossa/lic.pdf
%+
%^

%0 
%0 Journal Article
%A Harnad, Stevan
%D 2000
%T The invisible hand of peer review
%E 
%B Exploit Interactive
%C 
%I Exploit Interactive 5
%V 5
%6
%N 
%P 
%& 
%Y 
%S 
%7
%8 May
%9
%? 
%! 
%Z 
%@ 
%(
%)
%*
%L
%M
%1 
%2 
%3 article
%4 
%# 
%$ 
%F harnad2000invisible
%K hand, info20, invisible, peer, review
%X The refereed journal literature needs to be freed from both paper and its costs, but not from peer review, whose "invisible hand" is what maintains its quality. The residual cost of online-only peer review is low enough to be recovered from author-institution-end page charges, covered from institutional subscription savings, thereby vouchsafing a toll-free refereed research literature for everyone, everywhere, forever.
%Z Earlier Shorter version: Harnad, S. (1998) The invisible hand of peer review. Nature [online] (c. 5 Nov. 1998) http://helix.nature.com/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html Longer version: Harnad, S. (2000) The Invisible Hand of Peer Review, Exploit Interactive, issue 5, April 2000 {\ensuremath{<}}http://www.exploit-lib.org/{\ensuremath{>}}: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/{\texttt{\char126}}harnad/nature2.html http://www.princeton.edu/{\texttt{\char126}}harnad/nature2.html
%U http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/252862/
%+
%^

%0 
%0 Journal Article
%A Campanario, Juan Miguel
%D 1996
%T Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?
%E 
%B J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.
%C 
%I John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.
%V 47
%6
%N 4
%P 302--310
%& 
%Y 
%S 
%7
%8 April
%9
%? 
%! 
%Z 
%@ 0002-8231
%(
%)
%*
%L
%M
%1 
%2 Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?
%3 article
%4 
%# 
%$ 
%F campanario1996referees
%K info2.0, info20, peer, peer_review, reject, review
%X 
%Z 
%U http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=235902.235908
%+
%^