Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback
, , , , and .
Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, page 154--161. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2005)

This paper examines the reliability of implicit feedback generated from clickthrough data in WWW search. Analyzing the users' decision process using eyetracking and comparing implicit feedback against manual relevance judgments, we conclude that clicks are informative but biased. While this makes the interpretation of clicks as absolute relevance judgments difficult, we show that relative preferences derived from clicks are reasonably accurate on average.
  • @jaeschke
This publication has not been reviewed yet.

rating distribution
average user rating0.0 out of 5.0 based on 0 reviews
    Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).