@article{trant2009studying,
  abstract = {This paper reviews research into social tagging and folksonomy (as reflected in about 180 sources published through December 2007). Methods of researching the contribution of social tagging and folksonomy are described, and outstanding research questions are presented. This is a new area of research, where theoretical perspectives and relevant research methods are only now being defined. This paper provides a framework for the study of folksonomy, tagging and social tagging systems. Three broad approaches are identified, focusing first, on the folksonomy itself (and the role of tags in indexing and retrieval); secondly, on tagging (and the behaviour of users); and thirdly, on the nature of social tagging systems (as socio-technical frameworks).},
  author = {Trant, Jennifer},
  editor = {IMLS},
  interhash = {5490334e34a62eff630294c63ee864f0},
  intrahash = {39b779d7be72022c835f34a98dc25453},
  issn = {1368-7506},
  journal = {Journal of Digital Information},
  number = 1,
  title = {Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework},
  type = {Text.Serial.Journal},
  url = {https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/269},
  volume = 10,
  year = 2009
}

@article{harnad2000invisible,
  abstract = {The refereed journal literature needs to be freed from both paper and its costs, but not from peer review, whose "invisible hand" is what maintains its quality. The residual cost of online-only peer review is low enough to be recovered from author-institution-end page charges, covered from institutional subscription savings, thereby vouchsafing a toll-free refereed research literature for everyone, everywhere, forever.},
  author = {Harnad, Stevan},
  interhash = {72dc4c5e65fd5f3b6a5c8029b38964be},
  intrahash = {a011b84a49d70320efba300991e0554c},
  journal = {Exploit Interactive},
  month = may,
  note = {Earlier Shorter version: Harnad, S. (1998) The invisible hand of peer review. Nature [online] (c. 5 Nov. 1998) http://helix.nature.com/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html Longer version: Harnad, S. (2000) The Invisible Hand of Peer Review, Exploit Interactive, issue 5, April 2000 {\ensuremath{<}}http://www.exploit-lib.org/{\ensuremath{>}}: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/{\texttt{\char126}}harnad/nature2.html http://www.princeton.edu/{\texttt{\char126}}harnad/nature2.html},
  publisher = {Exploit Interactive 5},
  title = {The invisible hand of peer review},
  url = {http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/252862/},
  volume = 5,
  year = 2000
}

@article{agosti2012analysis,
  abstract = {In the last decade, the importance of analyzing information management systems logs has grown, because log data constitute a relevant aspect in evaluating the quality of such systems. A review of 10 years of research on log analysis is presented in this paper. About 50 papers and posters from five major conferences and about 30 related journal papers have been selected to trace the history of the state-of-the-art in this field. The paper presents an overview of two main themes: Web search engine log analysis and Digital Library System log analysis. The problem of the analysis of different sources of log data and the distribution of data are investigated.},
  author = {Agosti, Maristella and Crivellari, Franco and Di Nunzio, GiorgioMaria},
  doi = {10.1007/s10618-011-0228-8},
  interhash = {b3a3325250a6df194ab28f2e1f39c8b3},
  intrahash = {9b85b7d3c5587c5f0920f0d602ba93b1},
  issn = {1384-5810},
  journal = {Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery},
  language = {English},
  number = 3,
  pages = {663-696},
  publisher = {Springer US},
  title = {Web log analysis: a review of a decade of studies about information acquisition, inspection and interpretation of user interaction},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10618-011-0228-8},
  volume = 24,
  year = 2012
}

@article{yankauer1991blind,
  abstract = {No representative surveys of scientific opinion about blind review have been published, and there is very little information on the success of the blinding process. The American Journal of Public Health has practiced blind review since 1977.In 1989 to 1990 312 of its reviewers were asked to identify author and institution in the manuscript they reviewed, to provide clues to such identification, to express their opinion concerning blind review, and to offer reasons for their opinion.Reviewers claimed to be able to identify author and/or institution in 47% of the 614 chances offered; identification was incorrect 16% of the time, overall identification correct 39% of the time. Self-referencing was the clue to identification in 62%, personal knowledge in 38% of the cases. If only personal knowledge cases are considered, blinding was successful 83% of the time. Blinding was favored by 75% of the reviewers with most asserting it eliminated bias. Reasons given for opposing blind review included the following: blinding not possible, identification will not influence judgment, and its obverse, identification assists judgment.For the American Journal of Public Health blinding is usually, but not always, successful; and the majority of its reviewers favor current policy. Until more definitive data are in, reviewer preference, which differs from journal to journal, seems the most legitimate guide to journal policy on blind review.},
  author = {Yankauer, A},
  interhash = {92d5385c4028445c4f0d02a77080da01},
  intrahash = {ea6a73b1306832eebf5945b706186d54},
  journal = {Am J Public Health},
  month = jul,
  number = 7,
  pages = {843-845},
  pmid = {2053657},
  title = {How blind is blind review?},
  url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1405201/},
  volume = 81,
  year = 1991
}

@inproceedings{camussone2010innovative,
  author = {Camussone, P. and Cuel, R. and Ponte, D.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of: WOA 2010, Bologna, 16-18 giugno 2010},
  citeulike-article-id = {9562831},
  interhash = {0a9b01e3c73202f7cc5256c1d227326a},
  intrahash = {67a7b65635b3e5ce95a8f3fd21e0be7a},
  pages = {1--14},
  posted-at = {2011-07-19 15:22:31},
  priority = {0},
  title = {{ICT} and Innovative Review Models: Implications For The Scientific Publishing Industry},
  year = 2010
}

@article{mandavilli2011review,
  abstract = {Blogs and tweets are ripping papers apart within days of publication, leaving researchers unsure how to react.},
  author = {Mandavilli, Apoorva},
  interhash = {6ffabb9003e114b3a1ce45f0414a5752},
  intrahash = {4c6677f310dea46832b02043a2c42a1d},
  journal = {Nautre},
  number = 1,
  pages = {286--287},
  title = {Peer review: Trial by Twitter},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/469286a},
  volume = 469,
  year = 2011
}

@article{thelwall2005webometrics,
  author = {Thelwall, Mike and Vaughan, Liwen and Björneborn, Lennart},
  doi = {10.1002/aris.1440390110},
  interhash = {237ab6b776609c4f4b6291e53979980a},
  intrahash = {670a20dea46d1f5c5a0c4792627d3006},
  issn = {1550-8382},
  journal = {Annual Review of Information Science and Technology},
  number = 1,
  pages = {81--135},
  publisher = {Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company},
  title = {Webometrics},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440390110},
  volume = 39,
  year = 2005
}

@inproceedings{Dellarocas:2000:IOR:352871.352889,
  acmid = {352889},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Dellarocas, Chrysanthos},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce},
  doi = {10.1145/352871.352889},
  interhash = {5c4f092708c065dec499691002d23b22},
  intrahash = {a7bdb5b2f9f8ca80fb87fd8a23850f53},
  isbn = {1-58113-272-7},
  location = {Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States},
  numpages = {8},
  pages = {150--157},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {EC '00},
  title = {Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/352871.352889},
  year = 2000
}

@inproceedings{Whitby04filteringout,
  author = {Whitby, Andrew and Jøsang, Audun and Indulska, Jadwiga},
  interhash = {151548725ff496b07dc97c37f28f9f69},
  intrahash = {8d26ba3da23a9ba454281a670bd39a79},
  title = {Filtering Out Unfair Ratings in Bayesian Reputation Systems},
  year = 2004
}

@article{campanario1996referees,
  acmid = {235908},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Campanario, Juan Miguel},
  doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199604)47:4<302::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-0},
  interhash = {48043c3c836c850064810bdcc012b274},
  intrahash = {b6c868afbf6c28fffc1a9f0f7e8d8269},
  issn = {0002-8231},
  journal = {J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.},
  month = {April},
  number = 4,
  numpages = {9},
  pages = {302--310},
  publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.},
  title = {Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?},
  url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=235902.235908},
  volume = 47,
  year = 1996
}

@inproceedings{hu2004mining,
  acmid = {1014073},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Hu, Minqing and Liu, Bing},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining},
  doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1014052.1014073},
  interhash = {fa4cfdb6168dd55d8fb419fef992c631},
  intrahash = {88f1001cb2a901275383ad63b87d61fc},
  isbn = {1-58113-888-1},
  location = {Seattle, WA, USA},
  numpages = {10},
  pages = {168--177},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {KDD '04},
  title = {Mining and summarizing customer reviews},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1014052.1014073},
  year = 2004
}

@article{springerlink:10.1007/s11238-008-9109-z,
  abstract = {In this paper, we study a model of influence in a social network. It is assumed that each player has an inclination to say YES or NO which, due to influence of other players, may be different from the decision of the player. The point of departure here is the concept of the Hoede–Bakker index—the notion which computes the overall decisional ‘power’ of a player in a social network. The main drawback of the Hoede–Bakker index is that it hides the actual role of the influence function, analyzing only the final decision in terms of success and failure. In this paper, we separate the influence part from the group decision part, and focus on the description and analysis of the influence part. We propose among other descriptive tools a definition of a (weighted) influence index of a coalition upon an individual. Moreover, we consider different influence functions representative of commonly encountered situations. Finally, we propose a suitable definition of a modified decisional power.},
  affiliation = {Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne 106-112 Bd de l’Hôpital 75013 Paris France},
  author = {Grabisch, Michel and Rusinowska, Agnieszka},
  doi = {10.1007/s11238-008-9109-z},
  interhash = {e905db2be4b4d2e792719e9b8f445951},
  intrahash = {37444465dc4376fd111296cc8c9ba1de},
  issn = {0040-5833},
  issue = {1},
  journal = {Theory and Decision},
  keyword = {Business and Economics},
  pages = {69-96},
  publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
  title = {A model of influence in a social network},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11238-008-9109-z},
  volume = 69,
  year = 2010
}

@inproceedings{Claypool:2001:III:359784.359836,
  acmid = {359836},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Claypool, Mark and Le, Phong and Wased, Makoto and Brown, David},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces},
  doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/359784.359836},
  interhash = {1bcb8b08d1ec2e58666acae3d704710a},
  intrahash = {5965344f7121845f069848384fb3e0b9},
  isbn = {1-58113-325-1},
  location = {Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States},
  numpages = {8},
  pages = {33--40},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {IUI '01},
  title = {Implicit interest indicators},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/359784.359836},
  year = 2001
}

@inproceedings{Sherchan:2006:FMR:1141277.1141722,
  acmid = {1141722},
  address = {New York, NY, USA},
  author = {Sherchan, Wanita and Loke, Seng W. and Krishnaswamy, Shonali},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing},
  doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141722},
  interhash = {6a847312028872dfb07d2472b4e88ca6},
  intrahash = {afa80aad5c9222e20177793dfae5945a},
  isbn = {1-59593-108-2},
  location = {Dijon, France},
  numpages = {7},
  pages = {1886--1892},
  publisher = {ACM},
  series = {SAC '06},
  title = {A fuzzy model for reasoning about reputation in web services},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141722},
  year = 2006
}

@inproceedings{taraborelli2008review,
  author = {Taraborelli, Dario},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP ’08)},
  interhash = {b97c97a0b6d1aeaac597da2b2918dbfa},
  intrahash = {b496bb7eab8e8191c10e4d706fbc7c5e},
  title = {Soft peer review: Social software and distributed scientific evaluation},
  url = {http://nitens.org/docs/spr_coop08.pdf},
  year = 2008
}