@article{jaeschke2008tag,
  abstract = {Collaborative tagging systems allow users to assign keywords - so called "tags" - to resources. Tags are used for navigation, finding resources and serendipitous browsing and thus provide an immediate benefit for users. These systems usually include tag recommendation mechanisms easing the process of finding good tags for a resource, but also consolidating the tag vocabulary across users. In practice, however, only very basic recommendation strategies are applied. In this paper we evaluate and compare several recommendation algorithms on large-scale real life datasets: an adaptation of user-based collaborative filtering, a graph-based recommender built on top of the FolkRank algorithm, and simple methods based on counting tag occurences.  We show that both FolkRank and Collaborative Filtering provide better results than non-personalized baseline methods. Moreover, since methods based on counting tag occurrences are computationally cheap, and thus usually preferable for real time scenarios, we discuss simple approaches for improving the performance of such methods. We show, how a simple recommender based on counting tags from users and resources can perform almost as good as the best recommender. },
  address = {Amsterdam},
  author = {Jäschke, Robert and Marinho, Leandro and Hotho, Andreas and Schmidt-Thieme, Lars and Stumme, Gerd},
  doi = {10.3233/AIC-2008-0438},
  editor = {Giunchiglia, Enrico},
  interhash = {b2f1aba6829affc85d852ea93a8e39f7},
  intrahash = {955bcf14f3272ba6eaf3dadbef6c0b10},
  issn = {0921-7126},
  journal = {AI Communications},
  month = dec,
  number = 4,
  pages = {231--247},
  publisher = {IOS Press},
  title = {Tag Recommendations in Social Bookmarking Systems},
  url = {http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/jaeschke2008tag.pdf},
  vgwort = {63},
  volume = 21,
  year = 2008
}

@inproceedings{hotho2006information,
  abstract = {Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. At the moment, however, the information retrieval support is limited. We present a formal model and a new search algorithm for folksonomies, called FolkRank, that exploits the structure of the folksonomy. The proposed algorithm is also applied to find communities within the folksonomy and is used to structure search results. All findings are demonstrated on a large scale dataset.},
  address = {Heidelberg},
  author = {Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Schmitz, Christoph and Stumme, Gerd},
  booktitle = {The Semantic Web: Research and Applications},
  editor = {Sure, York and Domingue, John},
  interhash = {10ec64d80b0ac085328a953bb494fb89},
  intrahash = {3c301945817681d637ee43901c016939},
  month = {June},
  pages = {411-426},
  publisher = {Springer},
  series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
  title = {Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking},
  volume = 4011,
  year = 2006
}