@article{markus2003cocitation,
  abstract = {Abstract  After 30 years of research, co-citation analysis has become the dominant method for the empirical study of the structures
of scientific communication. There is a considerable variety of methods and, at the same time, a lack of methodological evaluation.This paper summarizes the present state of co-citation analysis and presents several methods of clustering references. Thedatabase used is a selection of 2,114 documents in the field of organization studies from 1986-2000. The evaluative studyshows that the choice of methods has a strong impact on the results created. It also shows that the methods of cluster andfactor analysis hitherto used have only a limited value in differentiating clearly between schools of scientific research- the 'invisible colleges'.},
  author = {Gmür, Markus},
  interhash = {f8d7adc52a63ff593c04f64251c9dffa},
  intrahash = {f5540ba3281db06a31c1bf73db95be44},
  journal = {Scientometrics},
  month = {#may#},
  number = 1,
  pages = {27--57},
  title = {Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023619503005},
  volume = 57,
  year = 2003
}