@misc{voss2007tagging, abstract = {This paper gives an overview of current trends in manual indexing on the Web. Along with a general rise of user generated content there are more and more tagging systems that allow users to annotate digital resources with tags (keywords) and share their annotations with other users. Tagging is frequently seen in contrast to traditional knowledge organization systems or as something completely new. This paper shows that tagging should better be seen as a popular form of manual indexing on the Web. Difference between controlled and free indexing blurs with sufficient feedback mechanisms. A revised typology of tagging systems is presented that includes different user roles and knowledge organization systems with hierarchical relationships and vocabulary control. A detailed bibliography of current research in collaborative tagging is included.}, author = {Voss, Jakob}, interhash = {c293cd6ef590c6aaf32df75cbdb9de82}, intrahash = {9ec98351dc630ea6b1f65046ba44a8dd}, note = {cite arxiv:cs/0701072Comment: Preprint. 12 pages, 1 figure, 54 references}, title = {Tagging, Folksonomy & Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing?}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0701072}, year = 2007 } @misc{voss2006collaborative, abstract = { This paper explores the system of categories that is used to classify articles in Wikipedia. It is compared to collaborative tagging systems like del.icio.us and to hierarchical classification like the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Specifics and commonalitiess of these systems of subject indexing are exposed. Analysis of structural and statistical properties (descriptors per record, records per descriptor, descriptor levels) shows that the category system of Wikimedia is a thesaurus that combines collaborative tagging and hierarchical subject indexing in a special way. }, author = {Voss, Jakob}, interhash = {7f47ede73627b6bd286a18325bc4d630}, intrahash = {269e8b153ed5856542d0a6e5b2bc7853}, note = {cite arxiv:cs/0604036Comment: 7 pages, 7 figures, 7 tables; v2 with added appendix and fixed references}, title = {Collaborative thesaurus tagging the Wikipedia way}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0604036}, year = 2006 } @misc{voss2003begriffssysteme, abstract = {Begriffssysteme tauchen als Thesauri, Klassifikationen, Nachschlagewerke,Begriffsnetze, Ontologien etc. in verschiedenen Fachwissenschaften zur Ordnung undRepräsentation von Wissen auf. Diese Arbeit gibt einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Artenvon Begriffssystemen und ihre Bestandteile. Dies sind im wesentlichen Begriffe, Bezeichnungenund Relationen. Die häufigsten Bestandteile und ihre Anwendungsfälle werden erklärt, darunter dieTerminologische Kontrolle, Begriffskombination, Notationen, die wichtigsten Relationsarten undRegeln sowie natürlich sprachliche Anteile. Es werden verschiedene Datenformate fürBegriffssysteme vorgestellt. Die gemeinsamen Strukturen und Bestandteile verschiedenerBegriffssysteme werden in dem gemeinsamen Datenmodell „Thema“ zusammengefasst, das anhandeiner XML-Repräsentation des Modells erläutert wird.}, author = {Voß, Jakob and \"Osterle, Hans}, interhash = {4d2644cbc2160ff4da83b51d2b2e631a}, intrahash = {5e435837b927c84585bd98a76f751669}, title = {Begriffssysteme}, url = {http://www.jakobvoss.de/epub/begriffssysteme03/begriffssysteme.pdf}, year = 2003 } @article{voss2007tagging, abstract = {This paper gives an overview of current trends in manual indexing on the Web. Along with a general rise of user generated content there are more and more tagging systems that allow users to annotate digital resources with tags (keywords) and share their annotations with other users. Tagging is frequently seen in contrast to traditional knowledge organization systems or as something completely new. This paper shows that tagging should better be seen as a popular form of manual indexing on the Web. Difference between controlled and free indexing blurs with sufficient feedback mechanisms. A revised typology of tagging systems is presented that includes different user roles and knowledge organization systems with hierarchical relationships and vocabulary control. A detailed bibliography of current research in collaborative tagging is included. }, author = {Voss, Jakob}, file = {voss2007tagging.pdf:voss2007tagging.pdf:PDF}, groups = {public}, howpublished = {Preprint}, interhash = {c293cd6ef590c6aaf32df75cbdb9de82}, intrahash = {6b4a65cb847069156a8ea54b9ec977c6}, journalpub = {1}, timestamp = {2011-02-02 13:49:32}, title = {Tagging, Folksonomy \& Co. Renaissance of Manual Indexing?}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0701072}, username = {dbenz}, year = 2007 } @article{voss2006collaborative, abstract = {This paper explores the system of categories that is used to classify articles in Wikipedia. It is compared to collaborative tagging systems like del.icio.us and to hierarchical classification like the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Specifics and commonalities of these systems of subject indexing are exposed. Analysis of structural and statistical properties (descriptors per record, records per descriptor, descriptor levels) shows that the category system of Wikimedia is a thesaurus that combines collaborative tagging and hierarchical subject indexing in a special way.}, author = {Voss, Jakob}, interhash = {7f47ede73627b6bd286a18325bc4d630}, intrahash = {bf3b43ebc016e2d340d0a5a893252a8b}, journal = {CoRR}, month = apr, title = {Collaborative thesaurus tagging the Wikipedia way}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0604036v2}, volume = {abs/cs/0604036}, year = 2006 } @inproceedings{voss2009mapping, abstract = {This poster presents a set of hash keys for bibliographic records called bibkeys. Unlike other methods of duplicate detection, bibkeys can directly be calculated from a set of basic metadata fields (title, authors/editors, year). It is shown how bibkeys are used to map similar bibliographic records in BibSonomy and among distributed library catalogs and other distributed databases.}, author = {Voss, Jakob and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert}, booktitle = {Information: Droge, Ware oder Commons?}, editor = {Kuhlen, Rainer}, interhash = {6e394e459d11dfa17f5d4cf1b8dd81c3}, intrahash = {01f6fe57f46e4b92fe02869341efdd8d}, organization = {Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft}, publisher = {Verlag Werner Hülsbusch}, series = {Proceedings of the ISI}, title = {Mapping Bibliographic Records with Bibliographic Hash Keys}, url = {http://eprints.rclis.org/15953/}, year = 2009 } @inproceedings{bibkey2009, abstract = {This poster presents a set of hash keys for bibliographic records called bibkeys. Unlike other methods of duplicate detection, bibkeys can directly be calculated from a set of basic metadata fields (title, authors/editors, year). It is shown how bibkeys are used to map similar bibliographic records in BibSonomy and among distributed library catalogs and other distributed databases.}, author = {Voss, Jakob and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert}, booktitle = {Information: Droge, Ware oder Commons?}, editor = {Kuhlen, Rainer}, interhash = {6e394e459d11dfa17f5d4cf1b8dd81c3}, intrahash = {01f6fe57f46e4b92fe02869341efdd8d}, organization = {Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft}, publisher = {Verlag Werner Hülsbusch}, series = {Proceedings of the ISI}, title = {Mapping Bibliographic Records with Bibliographic Hash Keys}, url = {http://eprints.rclis.org/15953/}, year = 2009 } @inproceedings{voss05measuring, author = {Voss, Jakob}, booktitle = {Proceedings International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics: 10 th}, interhash = {674a78066e8b98ec57a692ca7fb3c46b}, intrahash = {38f009374ff82c99e73160e376b05b55}, location = {Stockholm(Sweden)}, title = {Measuring Wikipedia}, url = {http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00003610/}, year = 2005 } @misc{voss-2007, abstract = {This paper gives an overview of current trends in manual indexing on the Web. Along with a general rise of user generated content there are more and more tagging systems that allow users to annotate digital resources with tags (keywords) and share their annotations with other users. Tagging is frequently seen in contrast to traditional knowledge organization systems or as something completely new. This paper shows that tagging should better be seen as a popular form of manual indexing on the Web. Difference between controlled and free indexing blurs with sufficient feedback mechanisms. A revised typology of tagging systems is presented that includes different user roles and knowledge organization systems with hierarchical relationships and vocabulary control. A detailed bibliography of current research in collaborative tagging is included.}, author = {Voss, Jakob}, interhash = {c293cd6ef590c6aaf32df75cbdb9de82}, intrahash = {9ec98351dc630ea6b1f65046ba44a8dd}, privnote = {- schöner Überblick - knowledge structures kombiniert mit indexing von IR und Tagging - etwas weit ausgeholt über das semotische Dreieck}, title = {Tagging, Folksonomy \& Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing?}, url = {http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:cs/0701072}, year = 2007 }